I believe the answer is: Will the researcher have collaborators at the research site abroad?
Ethical standard requires researchers to had a method to communicate with local language if the researches are conducted in foreign countries. Collabolators could be filled with external teams that able to interpret both languages, which would be deemed as sufficient by IRB.
Answer:
The researchers were studying change blindness.
Explanation:
In the "door study", participants were exposed to major visual changes. They would be giving a man directions when two other men walked between them carrying a door. At this moment, the original man asking for directions would walk away carrying the door while another man replaced him. Approximately 50% of participants did not notice the replacement. That phenomenon is called change blindness, and it usually takes place when a person's attention is not focused on visual details. Since the participants in the study were more concerned with giving directions than with their interlocutor's appearance, they wouldn't notice the change.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Customer satisfaction is a fixed factor in project management, it can't be changed, because customer satisfaction is the more reason why you are doing the project among other contractors. Every other things is liable to change, the scope can change, time can change ,even quality can change depending on the client but everything boils downs to the client satisfactions which will always remain the same, because the project has to be done to his satisfaction.
The experience that will suit in the scenario above in which
Emily is likely to feel in the stage of general adaptation syndrome is the
alarm stage. The alarm stage falls in the first stage where in the individual
is likely to be provided with a bursting energy in which Emily is likely to
experience.
