She most likely made a schedule. No doubt it was hard, but she managed.
Yeats states that he was not closely acquainted with the people in the Easter Rising. He acknowledges that he only exchanged pleasantries with them before the uprising. He also indicates that he has personal reasons for disliking one person. So he is writing about the cause for which they stood, which, by inference, is important.
The comparison of the rebels to "stone" suggests that Yeats may have viewed the rebels' attitude as inflexible or not adapted to the changing times. Yeats also acknowledges the possibility that their deaths may have been "needless" because the British might keep their promises.
However, his reference to the "sacrifice" (of all who had supported Irish independence) and the rebels' "excess of love" suggest that he views their cause in a positive light. Moreover, Yeats's repeated description of the kind of change that the uprising has brought about as "a terrible beauty" suggests that his sympathies lie with the rebels.
To summarize, Yeats places a certain distance between the rebels and himself, but he supports the rebels' cause.
In the written "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" Jonathan Edwards compare God's wrath to holding a spider over a fiery pit, great waters, flood that will break over a dam and a bow and arrow, according to this the groups of option should be settle as follows:
1. Non Believers a. falling rock
e. chaff
f. rough
2. Wrath of god b. storm
c. bow
d. spider
You have no answer choices. But when a writer does this they must give credit to the original owner by using in-text citations and/or putting credit on your works cited page.
Hope this helps :)
The language system is semantics. "Coke" v.s "Sprite." are two different words, so we are focusing on a word. When Anna paused, she was confused because to Melinda, A Coke means a Sprite in her vocabulary. She wanted to confirm the same meaning. Semantics involves a changing meaning depending on the person. She is visiting from Alabama, so the meanings may have chosen just like dialects. Thus, it cannot be phonology/morphology, syntax, or pragmatics.
