The correct answer to whether the statement <em>"Indicators are definite signs that abuse or neglect has taken place"</em> is true or false is false.
An indicator is a <em>trend or fact</em> that<em> indicates</em> the state or level of something - in this case, indicators <em>would be the definite signs </em>that abuse or neglect had taken place. However, if considering the verb <em>"to indicate"</em>, which means <em>to point out or to</em> something or someone, it can be understood that indicators <em>only provide the directions</em>, or call someone's attention in those directions. Therefore, <em>indicators alone couldn't be definite signs</em>, something not doubtful. Definite signs would have to <em>prove with data or documented facts</em> that abuse or neglect has taken place. Indicators alone <em>can't prove</em> the state or level of something, like abuse or neglect, but <em>only point in their direction</em>. Hence, the answer is <em>false.</em>
A whale. (because of the weight, the fins, the fact that it sprayed salty water and the barnacles on the head)
Answer:
A.because i just tuck the test
Explanation:
Answer:
The name of the website
Explanation:
Using the MLA guidelines, the information that should be listed first in the citation for this source is the name of the website, since the name of the author, in the case shown in the question above, is not available. In summary, we can say that the correct thing, according to the MLA, is that the first information is the name of the author, if the name of the author is not available, the correct thing is that the first information is the name of the website, as shown below:
A Day for Trees, US Department of Agriculture, January 10, 2014. <web address>. Accessed April 18, 2014.
