This text reflects the passage as a whole when the narrator illustrates anger at the woman by avoiding names. Through the use of parallelism, clear order, and repetition, coherence and unity are both successfully attained in “Was it a Dream?”. The story’s theme shows blind flattery to someone wherein the glorification of their image from ignorance results in the loss of truth.
Answer: <u>Eponymic</u>.
Explanation:
An eponym is a person after whom a discovery or place is named, or assumed to be named. In other words, it is a name or a noun which is formed after a person. New inventions are often connected to those who found them. The adjectives derived from eponym are eponymous and eponymic. As eponyms are based on proper nouns, they often begin with capital letters.
Answer:
B). Letter.
Explanation:
A variety of communication channels are employed as the manner in which a message is transferred or delivered from one individual to another individual or group.
As per the question, in order to convey a written and formal record to a person or authority, 'letters must be used' as they contain specific information in a precise, sophisticated, and notable form. The other channels are employed for distinct purposes like 'reports intend to present data' while 'e-mails help in providing reaction or feedback' instantly and 'blogs proffer the digital particulars to the readers'. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer: C) The author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like "silly" and "stupid."
Explanation: The words "silly" and "stupid" are the only instances of evidence among the options, since they were taken directly from the text that is being discussed. The closest example of bringing the text's content into the discussion is in option C (stating what the author has expressed), but that option doesn't present any conclusion. Option A is presented as a personal opinion with a vague origin ("I feel") and option B tries to back the presented conclusion with an assumption ("the author obviously hates [...] fast food") instead of evidence.
