<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
Answer: C. Leasers Decide To Meet At The Consultation.
Explanation: To start with it is best to know when each incident occurred.
A. Texas Troops Take San Antonio - December 1835
B. The Battle Of Gonzales Is Fought - October 2, 1835
C. Leaders Decide To Meet At The Consultation - March 1936
D. William Travis Leads An Insurrection At Anahuac - June 1835
From here you put things in order of occurrence.
D. William Travis first lead an insurrection at Anahuac.
B. Then the Battle of Gonzales occurred.
A. Next Texas troops take over San Antonio.
C. Finally, leaders decide to meet at the Consultation.
The correct answer is redress.
Redressing is a process in which an individual tries to get the ruling of a previous court case changed. This process involves a system of appeals, with the Supreme Court being the highest court of appeals in the country. Any ruling that results from a Supreme Court trumps any state law currently in place. This is because the Supreme Court is the most powerful court in the United States of America.
If Mr. Smith won his case, it would set a new precedent (example) in the United States.
B because it is not in first person and is informing the reader.
