answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
1 year ago
6

How many more rupees would 20 000 euros buy at peak exchange rate than at closing point?

Business
1 answer:
serg [7]1 year ago
6 0
There will be a total of 31,400 more rupees would 20000 euros buy at peak exchange rate than at closing point. We can buy more rupees at the peak exchange rate than at the closing point using the currency of Europe which is euro. The answer in this question is 31,400 more rupees can buy at 20000 euros.
You might be interested in
A North Face retail store in Chicago sells 500 jackets each month. Each jacket costs the store $100 and the company has an annua
algol13

Answer:

1) What is the annual holding and ordering cost?

annual ordering cost = $100 x 12 = $1,200

annual holding cost = ($100 x 25%) x [500 x 1/2(average inventory)] = $6,250

total $7,450

2) On average, how long does a jacket spend in inventory?

= 30 days / 2 = 15 days

3) If the retail store wants to minimize ordering and holding cost, what order size do you recommend?

economic order quantity (EOQ) = √[(2 x annual demand x order cost) / annual holding cost per unit]

EOQ = √[(2 x 6,000 x 100) / 25] = √48,000 = 219.09 units ≈ 219 units

4) How much would the optimal order reduce holding and ordering cost relative to the current policy?

EOQ = 219

total number of orders = 6,000 / 219 = 27.4 per year

average inventory = 219 / 2 = 109.5 units

annual ordering cost = $100 x 27.4 = $2,740

annual holding cost = ($100 x 25%) x 109.5 = $2,737.50

total $5,477.50

annual savings = $7,450 - $5,477.50 = $1,972.50

6 0
2 years ago
Assume the following facts are true for 2016: 318 million people lived in the United States. A total of 2,468,435 of these peopl
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

The number of people that were at risk for diabetes in 2016 is 289 million people

Explanation:

The number of persons at risk of a health outcome in a population is the difference between the total population and the number of persons that already have the health outcome in the population.

The number at risk of an outcome is calculated at the beginning of the year, before changes occur throughout the progression of the year, to accurately state the number at risk for that research year.

In our example, we will be concerned only about the data gotten at the beginning of the year, and these include;

The total population = 318,000,000 people

Number of persons with diabetes at the beginning of 2016 = 29,000,000 people.

Therefore, number of persons at risk for diabetes in 2016 = The total population - Number of persons with diabetes at the beginning of 2016

= 318,000,000 - 29,000,000 = 289,000,000 (289 million) people).

Note do not confuse this with the risk ratio for diabetes in 2016, which is the ratio of the number with diabetes and the total population.

5 0
1 year ago
Let’s see how fees can hurt your investment strategy. Let’s assume that your mutual fund grows at an average rate of 5% per year
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

We notice that the more the fees increase for a constant rate of return, the number of years it takes to double on the investment also increases. For example;

a). 15.6 years

b). 20 years

c). 28 years

Explanation:

The rule of 70 is a formula that can be used to estimate the number of years it will take an investment to double up.The formula is expressed as;

Number of years to double=70/Annual rate of return

a). Given;

Annual rate of return per unit of investment=5%

Annual fees per unit of investment=0.5%

Net rate of return=Annual rate of return-Annual fees=(5%-0.5%)=4.5%

Replacing;

Number of years to double=70/Net rate of return

=70/4.5=15.555 to nearest tenth=15.6 years

b). Given;

Annual rate of return per unit of investment=5%

Annual fees per unit of investment=1.5%

Net rate of return=Annual rate of return-Annual fees=(5%-1.5%)=3.5%

Replacing;

Number of years to double=70/Net rate of return

=70/3.5=20.0 to nearest tenth=20 years

c). Given

Annual rate of return per unit of investment=5%

Annual fees per unit of investment=2.5%

Net rate of return=Annual rate of return-Annual fees=(5%-2.5%)=2.5%

Replacing;

Number of years to double=70/Net rate of return

=70/2.5=28.0 to nearest tenth=28 years

We notice that the more the fees increase for a constant rate of return, the number of years it takes to double on the investment also increases

6 0
2 years ago
Your consulting firm has been hired by the State of California to help them decide on funding for the University of California.
melomori [17]

Answer:

Agree with the analysis statement. The State should financially assist those who wish to study further.

Explanation:

Preparing oneself for a career isn’t the only practical benefit of a college education. In a report by The College Board (Ma, Pender &Welch, 2019), the following can be noted:

• Individuals with higher levels of education earn more, pay more taxes, and are more likely than others to be employed. In 2018, the median earnings of bachelor’s degree recipients with no advanced degree working full time were $24,900 higher than those who only completed high school. Bachelor’s degree recipients paid an estimated $7,100 more in taxes and took home $17,800 more in after-tax income than high school graduates. The unemployment rate for individuals age 25 and older with at least a bachelor’s degree has consistently been about half of the unemployment rate for high school. In 2018, the unemployment rate for 25- to 34-year-olds with at least a bachelor’s degree was 2.2%, compared with 5.7% among high school graduates.

• Earnings increase with level of education, but there is considerable variation in earnings at each level of educational attainment. The percentage of full-time year-round workers age 35 to 44 earning $100,000 or more in 2018 ranged from 2% of those without a high school diploma and 5% of high school graduates to 28% of those whose highest attainment was a bachelor’s degree and 43% of advanced degree holders.

• Having a college degree is associated with a healthier lifestyle, potentially reducing health care costs. Adults with higher levels of education are more active citizens than others and are more involved in their children’s activities. In 2018, 69% of 25- to 34-year-olds with at least a bachelor’s degree and 47% of high school graduates reported exercising vigorously at least once a week.  

• College education increases the chance that adults will move up the socioeconomic ladder and reduces the chance that adults will rely on public assistance. Among those who attended the most selective colleges, 68% of children from the lowest parent income quintile were in the top two income quintiles as adults, compared with 72% of children from the middle-income quintile and 76% from the highest income quintile.  

Having a tertiary qualification leads more young people starting their own entrepreneurial ventures to help fight unemployment. This increases job creation in the state and ultimately reduces poverty.  

Supporting tertiary students in University of California will be in the best interests of the citizens as well the state since their contribution to economic growth, employment opportunities and health awareness will be quite considerable.  

4 0
2 years ago
An investor company owns 30% of the common stock of an investee company. The investor has significant influence over the investe
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

Income for investee during the year ended December 31th 2019: $ 17,200

Explanation:

Purchase value                                       525,000

Equity proportion: 1,500,000  30% =    (450,000)

                           Goodwill                         75,000

Transactions during the year:

income 60,000 x 30% =  18,000

dividends 15,000 x 30% = (4,500)

unrealized profit 2018:

30,000 = cost (1.25)

30,000 / 1.25 = 24,000

gross profit 6,000

unrealized gain: 6,000 x 30% = (1,800)

unrealized profit 2019:

40,000 = cost (1.25)

40,000/1.25 = cost

cost = 32,000

gross profit: 40,000 - 32,000 = 8,000

proportion of unrealized gain:

                   8,000 x 30% =      (2,400)

profit for 2018 realized              1,800

                    net adjustment        600

<u></u>

<u>income from investee:</u>

18,000 - 600 (net unrealized gain) = 17,200

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Timothy is planning the pricing strategy for his company’s products. He is directed by the management to add a premium (amount a
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an unintended consequence of the rise of the primary and caucus system? Question 3 options:
    10·1 answer
  • Which element(s) affect shirt sizes? A. amount of fabric used B. texture and color C. collar fitting and sleeve length D. intern
    10·1 answer
  • Zappos employees are "driven" to participate in charitable activities and feel that giving back to the community is something th
    8·1 answer
  • Sales are $1.44 million, cost of goods sold is $570,000, depreciation expense is $144,000, other operating expenses is $294,000,
    10·1 answer
  • Sheffield Corp. took a physical inventory on December 31 and determined that goods costing $165,000 were on hand. Not included i
    15·1 answer
  • A local car dealer offers "zero percent" interest on a $20,000 automobile for 36 monthly payments. if a customer either pays cas
    9·2 answers
  • The diagnostic role of marketing research includes gathering and presenting factual statements.a. trueb. false
    6·2 answers
  • Suppose that every time a fund manager trades stock, transaction costs such as commissions and bid−ask spreads amount to 0.4% of
    15·2 answers
  • Sela traveled from her home in Flagstaff to San Francisco to seek specialized medical care. Because she was unable to travel​ al
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!