Jackson's supporters thought he'd made a good presidential candidate because:
He had years of political experience.
He was known as a war hero and champion of the people.
He was a Tennessee booster.
The answer to this question is: titchner
<span>Edward B. Titchener was a British psychologist that responsible in creating his version of psychology that describes the structure of our mind.
</span>Just like the elements on the periodic table, Edward B. Titcher wants to arrange the thigs that could influence human's intelligence
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the links to the websites are not attached to explore them. However, we can comment on the following.
Two people were key parts of the development of the story of the Watergate Scandal. I am referring to the Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.
Both reporters became too interested in the events of June 1972, that kept on investigating and reporting information until they revealed that United States President Richard Nixon had connections with that event, when burglars were arrested bu the police, when they were robbing documents form the Democratic National Committee headquarters, in Washington D.C.
These two brave journalists end up winning the Pulitzer Price in 1973 for their coverage. They documented all their experiences in the best seller books "All the President's Men" and "The Final Days."
That is why I think the life and actions of the two reporters illuminate important aspects of the Watergate scandal.
The answer is Explanation.
The social scientists were asked an explanatory situation in which they are required for reasons and evidence. In this case, these social scientists will use their critical thinking skill specifically explanation.
Explaining their reasons, opinions, and evidence will give the audience the satisfactory they were looking for. Actually, explanation of things will more likely work out in their case if they were asked about their research.
Answer: The correct answer is: "As of January 2015, the NIH expects investigators to obtain the informed (valid) consent of research participants in NIH - funded genetic research for broad research use of data and data sharing, even if the cell lines or specimens are de-identified."
Explanation:
De-identification refers to the process of keep hidden someone's personal information. In general, people who participate in a research want their personal information (name, ID, address, phone number, date of birth) maintain anonymous. For that reason, the NIH expects investigators to obtain the informed (valid) consent of research participants even if they had decided to keep their samples as de-identified.
