Answer:
d. demonstration.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. simulation.
b. model.
c. case study.
d. demonstration.
This is an example of a demonstration. A demonstration is an example in which the person exemplifies how something is performed. This is usually a practical exhibition, and it allows the person to give proof or evidence of how something operates. In this example, April is able to show the difference between pressure and force through her demonstration.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Students should say that the face validity could be established by giving his measure to experts (they can state several examples of experts) and having them look at whether the items make sense (look like they measure religiosity). Students should say that the content validity could be established by giving his measure to experts (again, they can state several examples of experts) and have them look at whether the statements measure the components of religiosity (which, from the definition, may include devotion and piety, although the students do not have to be this specific).
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Organize the message. 
Decide whether to use an extemporaneous or scripted delivery. 
Decide whether to record one podcast or a series.
Explanation:
These are all tips that Maria should follow when creating her podcasts. It is a good idea for Maria to organize her message clearly. This will allow her to deliver a message that is clear, structured and cohesive. She should also decide whether to use an extemporaneous or a scripted delivery. This will allow her to have a consistent tone throughout her different podcasts. Finally, Maria should decide whether it is more convenient for her to record one podcast or a series. This will encourage her to develop a structure that provides consistency to her work.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled 
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
The right answer is the last one: negative incentive and tariff. These duties and taxes are negative incentives, or disincentives, because they attempt to discourage people from buying those cars (and buying national cars instead), and also tariffs, since they must be paid on certain classes of imports or exports.