Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
Answer:
hii there
hru?
Explanation:
The correct answer is option ( C ) London
Hope it helps
have a nice day
It reflects the author’s view that children and teenagers play violent video games for far too many hours.
Answer:
France was effectively contained by strong neighboring powers.
Explanation:
The results of the Congress of Viena created a new European landscape.
Delegates caused a reconfiguration of European geopolitical system:
<em>Since European powers wanted to reset back to pre Napoleonic times, the goal of containing France was to restore the old limits and resize the distribution of land so they could create a way of balancing each other and remain in peace.</em>
Metternich was one of the key delegates: he wanted to avoid future wars with France, so he restored power back to Europe's royal families and France was forced to return the territories it once gained from Napoleon in 1795, till 1810.
<u>This meant that Russia increased its influence over Poland and Finland.</u>
<u>In the case of the Austrians, their power was limited in order to preserve peace. </u>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
