Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
unconditional stimulus, conditional stimulus, conditional response
Explanation:
Answer: The correct answer is: Recognizing needs.
Explanation: Needs recognition in the consumer decision-making process refers to the stage in which a person establishes and decides what are his/her needs. A consumer feels that there's something that he/she is missing and will try to feel that lacking with a product.
<u> It is the first stage in the consumer decision-making process</u>.
In this particular case, Camila determines that since she runs more regularly now, she wants shoes that can withstand many days of pounding the pavement.
<u>She has determined her needs.</u>
Answer: The investigator are wrong to be confident in their arrest because their is no perfect match in the finger print of the person been arrested and the one gotten from the crime scene. Because their have failed to compare the finger prints pattern seen in their records, to the one gotten from the crime scene.
The investigators are wrong in their arrest because one finger that has a whorl and loop fingerprint pattern cannot produce two different finger print pattern, which was gotten from the crime scene.
Another reason why the investigator are incorrect with their arrest is because, the crime record of the man arrested is very different from the crime committed. They should have traced the people with similar crime records, that has a similar finger prints with the one gotten from the scene.
1. Spain's transfer of territory to France - 1682
2. Pinckney's Treaty 1795
3. Louisiana purchase - 1803
4. Pike's expedition in the Southwest - 1805