You agree to sell your car to your neighbor for $5,000. you and your neighbor have provided each other:

Minden Company is a wholesale distributor of premium European chocolates. The company’s balance sheet as of April 30 is given be

Anettt [7]

Answer:(1a) schedule of cash collected $221,800, schedule of cash disbursement for merchandise purchase $118,900 (1b) cash budget closing balance $19,260 (2) Net income $26,410 (3) Balance sheet Total Asset $364,510, Total Liabilities &Equity $364,510

Explanation:

Schedule of cash collected

Sales. 257,000

Less:Cash sales. 77,100

------------

Credit sales. 179,900

Cash collected in May

Credit sales( 50% ) 77,100

Account Receivable 54,750

May sales (179,900 × 50%) 89,950

---------------

Total cash collected. 221,800

-------------------

Schedule of cash disbursements for merchandise

Cash paid for May purchases (121,000×40%) 48,400

Cash paid for April purchases. 70,500

--------------

Total purchase payment for May. 118,900

-----------------

Cash Budget

Opening balance. 9,600

Add: Receipt

Collection from customers 221,800

Bank loan. 22,000

--------------

Total cash available. 253,400

Less: Disbursements

Purchase payment 118,900

Selling Expenses. 83,700

Note payable. 18,100

Interest on Note payable 340

Purchase of refrigerating equipment 13,100

----------------

Total Disbursement. 234,140

----------------

Closing Balance. 19,260

----------------

Minden company

Budgeted income statements for the month of may

Sales. 257,000

Cost of good sold

Beginning inventory 53,750

Add: purchases. 121,000

---------------

Goods available for sale 174,750

Less: Ending inventory. 31,000

-------------

Cost of good sold. 143,750

----------------

Gross Margin. 113,250

Selling & Administrative Expenses

(83,700 + 2,800) 86,500

---------------

Net operating income. 26,750

Less: interest expense. 340

----------------

Net income. 26,410

------------------

Budgeted Balance sheet

Asset

Cash. 19,260

Account Receivable 89,950

Inventory. 31,000

Building & Equipment

Net of Deprecation.

(214,000 + 13,100 - 2,800) 224,300

-----------------

Total Asset. 364,510

------------------

Liabilities & Equity

Account Payable(121,000 × 60%) 72,600

Note payable. 22,000

Common Stock. 180,000

Retained Earnings( 63,500 + 26,410) 89,910

------------------

Total Liabilities & Equity. 364,510

------------------

8 0

2 years ago

Your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB). You agree that this stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrat

g100num [7]

Complete question:

Assume that your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB), which he thinks has very little risk. You agree that the stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrate that his risk would be even lower if he were more diversified. You obtain the following returns data for West Coast Bank (WCB). Both banks have had less variability than most other stocks over the past 5 years.

Year ECB WCB

2004 40.00% 40.00%

2005 -10.00% 15.00%

2006 35.00% -5.00%

2007 -5.00% -10.00%

2008 15.00% 35.00%

a. What is the expected return and risk of each stock?

b. Measured by the standard deviation of returns, by how much would your uncle's risk have been reduced if he had held a portfolio consisting of 60% in ECB and the remainder in WCB? In other words, what is the difference between portfolio's standard deviation and weighted average of components' standard deviations? (Hint: check the example on page 11-12 on my note).

Solution:

The estimated return of the stock is the average profit.

So the average of ECB is (40-10+35-5+15)/5

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15% expected return

WCB expected return = 40+15-5-10+35

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15%

They've had the same planned return.

This is generally defined in the Greek letter Mu, (U) A weighted average may also be used to calculate portfolio volatility.

Standard deviation of ECB is $\sqrt{{ sum [(x-U)^2]/5}}$

so for ECB:

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(-10-15)^2$ = $-35^2$ = 0.1225

$(35-15)^2$ = $20^2$ = 0.04

$(-5-15)^2$ = $-20^2$ = 0.04

$(15-15)^2$ =0

now 0.0625+0.1225+0.04+0.04+0=0.265

stdev= $\sqrt{(0.265/5)}$ = 0.23

So WCB is the same except in a different order to make things quick I'm only going to add the median again WCB=0.23

Then the 60/40 portfolio will be the "weighted average" of the returns.

portfolio returns

2004: (60%*40%)+(40%*40%) = 40%

2005: (60%*-10%)+(40%*15%) = 0%

2006: (60%*35%)+(40%*-5%) = 19%

2007: (60%*-5%)+(40%*-10%) = -7%

2008:(60%*15%)+(40%*35%) = 23%

we have an average return of (40+19-7+23)/5 = 75/5 =15%

The estimated return of all combined stocks is a better way to do so.

we knew they both had expected returns of 15% so we can say

(60%*15%)+(40%*15%)=15% so the portfolio has an expected return of 15%

Now we do the standard deviation for the whole portfolio and get

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(0-15)^2$ = - $25^2$ =6.25%

$(19-15)^2$ = $4^2$ = 0.16%

$(-7-15)^2$ = $-22^2$ = -4.84%

$(23-15)^2$ = $8^2$ = 0.64%

now add them up and get 9.78%

$\sqrt{(9.78%/5)}$ = 13.98%

Therefore, the normal portfolio variance is 13.98 per cent and the predicted portfolio return is 15 per cent.

Every stock has a standard deviation of 23 per cent and an average return of 15 per cent, meaning that the fund has the same estimated return but with less standard deviation. This ensures that the same gain is less costly. It's stronger than any of these products.

5 0

1 year ago

A stability strategy is a grand strategy that involves little or no significant organizational change. For example, Love Forever

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": True.

Explanation:

Stability strategies are those in which the firm does not change its core method of working, thus, it remains to focus on its current products and markets. Carrying out stability strategies is a less risky approach. The types of stability strategies can be no-change strategy; profit strategy; and growth through concentration, integration, diversification, co-operation, internationalization.

6 0

2 years ago

Lauren's salary decreases from $ 37,000 to $ 30,000 . She decides to reduce the number of outfits she purchases each year from 2

nikklg [1K]

Answer:

E=-4.0746

Explanation:

Using the midpoint method, Lauren's income elasticity of demand for new outfits is determined by the change in income multiplied by the average number of outfits, divided by the change in the number of outfits multiplied by the average income:

$E=\frac{\Delta I*O_{avg}}{\Delta O*I_{avg}}\\E=\frac{(37,000-30,000)*\frac{20+19}{2}}{(19-20)*\frac{37,000+30,000}{2}}\\E=-4.0746$

Her income elasticity of demand for new outfits is -4.0746.

8 0

1 year ago

The center of gravity method determines the best x and y coordinates for multiple faclities by finding a central location and th

babymother [125]

Answer:

The answer is True.

Explanation:

The center of gravity method is a concept under Operations Management as it relates to facilities distribution such as warehouses or fulfillment centers.

Center of Gravity Strategy/Method is defined as a concept that seeks to calculate geographic coordinates for a potential single new facility that will minimize costs. Under this approach the main factors considered are:

Cost of Shipping
Markets
Volume of goods shipped

Operations managers prefer to use this approach in siting the location of their facilities because:

It minimizes cost.
It is simple to compute
It takes in to consideration existing facilities

How to use the Center of Gravity Method

Step 1:

Place existing facility(ies) such warehouse, fulfillment center, and distribution center locations in a coordinate grid.
situate the grid on an ordinary map.
The distances between the facilities must be noted.

Step 2:

Then, using the equations below,

Fx= âˆ‘ dix Vi/ âˆ‘ Vi

Fy= âˆ‘ diy Vi/ âˆ‘ Vi

Proceed to calculate the X and Y coordinates using these equations where Fx is the X (horizontal axis) coordinate for the new facility, and

Fy is the Y (vertical axis) coordinate for the new facility, dix is the X coordinate of the current location, diy is the Y coordinate of the existing location, and Vi is the volume of goods moved to or from the ith location.

Step 3:

After you have obtained the X and Y coordinates place that location on the map.

This approach allows for point of departure – or, literally, a starting point of where (from the perspective of longitude and latitude) you options are for where to grow your fulfillment or logistics network.

Cheers!

8 0

1 year ago