The main points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.
Option: A and C
Explanation:
Main points for a speech about the achievements of Ida Wells-Barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points. Proper guidelines should be maintained and for that all the points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.
According to the time of event or time occurrence achievement list would be prepared and point wise division should not split the consistency of the topic. If it is then the relevance would get disturbed.
Answer:
Emotional self-regulation.
Explanation:
Emotional self-regulation can be understood in psychology as the idea of individuals voluntarily responding with a range of emotions that are healthy and socially acceptable to the demands of day to day life.
Emotional self-regulation involves the process that the person makes to regulate and control their own emotions and feelings as well as the impact that those emotions have on other people.
In this particular case, Jeff is advising Maya to self regulate her emotions, by telling her to smile while at work jeff is advising Maya to voluntarily control her emotions and see how that affects her work life.
Because <span>Many rural residents consist craft workers who opposed the ratification (which will definitely icnrease their tax payment if the federalist party took the power) and this region also has less merchants and traders.
</span>The majority of federalist party on the other hand, could be easily found in near atlantic seacost because <span> they ahve more trade and merchants, which means they need the help of the Feds to regulate their trades</span>
The Type II error would be to conclude that EnerG is no more nutritious than Supreme when Energy actually provides more health benefits.
Option b
<u>Explanation:</u>
Type II error sometimes referred to as beta error is a term in statistics that doesn’t reject the false-null hypothesis. It occurs when one refuses to reject the false null hypothesis. In this type of error, the false findings are accepted as true.
It also confirms two different scenarios as similar even though they are different. It can be reduced by adjusting the criteria of the null hypothesis by increasing tolerance with caution to ensure that the error type doesn’t end up being Type I error.
