The answers to your question are,
A. Flat bottomed boats;
B. Carts driven by animals;
D. Seagoing vessels.
-Mabel <3
Answer:
1. culture and communication
2. context and power
Explanation:
Intercultural communication often referred to as ICC, is a term that describes the study of communication in various cultures and societies, specifically in ways in which culture relates with communication.
In other words, ICC explains various process of communication and its characteristics including the problems that are associated with it, in a different cultural and social context which consist people of various background such as religion, social, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
ICC has four interrelated components which includes:
1. culture
2. communication
3. context
4. power
Hence, the textbook states that CULTURE and COMMUNICATION is the foreground and CONTEXT and POWER is the backdrop against which we can understand intercultural communication
The answer is “both saw it as a necessary response to the privileges of royalty and aristocrats”
Though both agreed that Revolution was necessary in France against royalty and aristocrats, what Washington an Jefferson disagreed on was American intervention to aid the French Revolution. Jefferson felt the United States owed France aid in war since after the French had aided in the American Revolution they signed a treaty promising to provide aid if France then after went to war. Washington on the other hand felt that their obligation to the treaty had been terminated since the king whom they signed the treaty with was now dead, and he did not otherwise think it would be a good idea to engage Americans in the French Revolution because he worried that it would not only be too expensive for the newly formed nation but would also cost too many American lives
(Sorry for the unsolicited history lesson, oh well, maybe it’ll help you with later questions)
Answer:
Explanation:
M. Pollan (2006) describes in his book “The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals” that human kind has fighted to get food as a basic need since ancient times. Nowadays, modernity and the intervention of science have made possible to have almost all kinds of foods available at the supermarket, while in the past, in order to have food, humans needed to depend on their skills to grow or hunt their meals, because as omnivores as we are, we eat basically everything (vegetable or animal) and need it in order to survive. Though, we like to think that we now have a great diversity available, Pollan (2006) describes in his book that this is only an illusion, created by capitalism, because basically must of our food is only corn in different presentations, at the end, only corn…he refers “ there are some forty-five thousand items in the average American supermarket and more than a quarter of them contain corn” (p.11)
References: Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin.
I believe the answer is: <span>uncertainty avoidance
</span><span>uncertainty avoidance refers to an effort that made by individuals to tolerate a certain amount of ambiguity in order to cope with their anxiety.
</span>This could often be spotted in superstition believers, because people like to attributing uncertain situation on the mercy of higher being in order not to held accountable for the outcome.
