Answer:
Its important to diversify because it can help an investor manage risk and reduce the volatility of an asset's price movements. If his high risk investment backfires hes left with almost nothing, diversifying can give him a safety blanket just incase. The many ways he can diversify include, but aren't limited to, Use asset allocation or target date funds, Invest in a mix of mutual funds or ETFs, Customize with individual stocks and bonds, Vary company size and type, Invest abroad, and add complexity.
Explanation:
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
The product already enjoys relatively high awareness and accessibility therefore Increasing awareness by 5% does not need to increase market share quickly,thus A) Increase awareness by 5% is incorrect.
Re-position the product to the ideal spot within the segment shall take a lot of time for the company to grab the market share.So D) is incorrect.
Increase in unit contribution margin by decreasing the MTBF need not increase the sales in the market thus B is incorrect.
C) Lower the unit selling price to the bottom limit of the segment price range seems correct by Lowering the unit selling price to the bottom limit of the segment price range the demand shall increase for the product increasing the market share in shorter term.
Answer: an online bill payment
Explanation:
I’m doing apex and it shows that the correct answer is an online bill payment
Explanation:
First of all, the dealer should not have sold the car to the sixteen year old boy without the presence of his parents or any guardian. It is illegal to have a contract with a child who is not legally allowed to drive the car before the age of eighteen.
Now secondly if the dealer has somehow sold the car to the boy, the boy cannot come back after few months and ask for returning his money because he purchased the car, the condition of the condition of the car got worse during the whole time when car was with him, and also there is no legal clause in the agreement which allows him to demand his money back after using the car for this long time. So demanding his money back from the dealer is totally unethical as well as illegal. The dealer is true that the car is still the property of the boy and the money is still the dealer's money.
<span>The clause is most likely unenforceable. Depending on the severablity, the contract much state what is to be held liable and what is illegal in the situation. If there are illegal provisions, there may be unenforceable actions due to the clause. </span>
