In Ursula Le Guin's "The Wife's Story" readers witness how a pack of wolves kill "the human thing".
From the perspective of a mother, one may understand that it was a necessary thing to do rather than the right one. As we can see in the text itself, the "human thing" was behaving in a very aggressive manner, trying to attack and kill his own children with a branch from a tree. Being left with no other choice, wolves, being predators by nature, protected the cubs and killed the attacker thus depriving him of any chances to repeat his violent actions in future.
As humans, we detest murder as a way of punishment or revenge, but in the given story we deal with wolves, and such behaviour is understandable from their perspective, moreover, one can clearly see that this was done only for protection.
Answer:
- The missing pages in Dr. Yu Tsun's statement become an extended metaphor <u>that helps solve the mystery</u>.
Explanation:
The pretentious student of history continues to reveal his trump card. It's a statement or a type of oral declaration given by an observer to be utilized in a preliminary. For this situation, the affidavit is managed by a man named Dr. Yu Tsun, and the initial two pages are absent.
The remainder of the story is the testimony, told from the perspective of Dr. Yu Tsun. Since the initial two pages are "missing," we begin in mid-sentence.
@Emanualgarzaoz2bcj
did you get it?