Answer:
The most effective responses will be those aimed at restoring harmony between supervisors, allowing all sectors to work efficiently. The least effective responses will be those that seek to help only one supervisor or just one, or some sectors, to the detriment of the others.
Explanation:
As we can see, Jamie is in a situation where his management is very important. This is because the sector of the 9 supervisors on the front line of a given service, are in conflict with each other, which ends up harming the company's success, since it is necessary that all sectors work together.
The meeting established by Jamie, has the responsibility to evaluate the arguments of the supervisors and choose those that will bring an effective result within the company. Jamie must choose as efficient the arguments that show cooperative forms among supervisors, which promote the good functioning of all sectors. However, he must consider as non-efficient, all those arguments that provide separatist ideas and that promote the growth of only some sectors to the detriment of others.
Answer:
The options actually are:
No; our company’s concern with product quality has allowed competitors to capture market share by offering slightly inferior but less expensive products.
Argument strong / weak
Yes; many employees ignore company procedures designed to ensure that our product quality standards are met.
Argument strong / weak
The first argument is strong
The second argument is weak
Explanation:
The first argument is logical because keeping up with the competitors' low priced products is a genuine source of concern.The quality procedures could still be adhered strictly if the product is perceived as been of very high quality in the eyes of the customers, as the saying goes that the real beauty lies in the eyes of the beholders,meaning that this is something for customers to judge.
The second argument is weak,override of control procedures by some employees is not a tenable excuse not to have the right quality products manufactured,since carrot and stick approach of punishing non-compliant employees and rewarding compliant employees is at their disposal.
Answer:
no review is required
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this specific scenario no review is required. This is mainly due to the fact that if a proposed study qualifies for an exemption (such as is the case in this scenario) then federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where the research will be done.
I Believe the answer is <span>semantic system
</span><span>semantic system revolves aroun our ability to distinguish comparison between different types of concept.
In this particular case, Louise still hasn't develop the ability to distinguish the concept of different meaning that drives from the same word, which make her falsely understood what 'shower' mean in that particular situation.</span>
Central Asian countries that have large amounts of proven
oil reserves might expect a greater interest in diplomatic relations from other
nations, especially industrialized ones.
Central Asia is the core region of the Asian continent and stretches
from the Caspian Sea in the west to China in the east and from Afghanistan in
the south to Russia in the north.
The correct answer between all
the choices given is the third choice or letter C. I am hoping that this answer
has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and
if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
