The correct order are as follows:
3. Tessman shows Hedda the manuscript.
5. Brack relates the story of the night before.
1. Lovborg tells Thea he destroyed the manuscript.
2. Hedda gives Lovbory a gun.
4. Hedda burns the manuscript.
The events above are drawn from Hedda Gabler Act 3.
The act relays how Lovborg lost his manuscripts at a party, Tessman saw the manuscript and gave it to his wife, Hedda to keep. Lovborg came to Hedda house and lied to Thea that he destroyed the manuscript and this severed the relationship between them. After Thea left, Hedda gave a gun to Lovborg and proceeded to burn the manuscripts after Lovborg left.
<h3><u>Inclusion of Rebekah and Ben Erler’s story contribute to central ideas of the speech:</u></h3>
Obama wanted to convey about the struggles America was facing and how they would overcome it and Rebekah and Ben Erler’s story provided the context for the speech. He spoke about the struggles the couples faced during the Great Recession and how they overcame the Recession.
Rebekah was a Waitress and Ben worked at a Construction Site so when the Recession hit just like other middle class families, Ben lost his job and they were in due for a baby. They worked hard all way changed their lifestyle and built a house and had another baby. They are great inspiration for many Americans who also face the same struggle now and by time they would eventually overcome like these couple.
Answer:
"Wheels" refers to the wheels of the car beginning to turn as Milo thinks. It also refers to the "wheels" of Milo's mind turning after not doing much thinking for a long time.
Alcott most likely begin the chapter with character dialogue to keep the momentum of the story going. In order to preserve the set pace of the story, author decided to continue dialogue that started in previous chapter. When dividing the story on chapters, she wanted to hide this 'gap', that readers usualy feel between them.
Answer:
A. conforming to social conventions
B. criticism of a middle class lifestyle
E. the necessity of companionship
Explanation:
The first alternative is supported by the first part of the passage in which Tolstoy describes all the reasons why Fedorovna seems to be a good match for Ilyich in the eyes of the society and Ivan Ilyitch himself.
The second alternative is an overall conclusion that can be derived from the fact that the passage describes marriage more like a business deal than a derivation of love.
The third alternative is revealed to us by the fact that Ivan Ilyitch knew himself that Fedorovna is not her best match, but decided to still marry her, because he needed to have a partner.
