Answer:
The correct answer is The owners themselves.
Explanation:
The Coase Theorem points out that if property rights are well defined and transaction costs are zero, the negotiation between the parties will lead us to an optimal point of allocation in the market.
According to Coase's theorem, when the parties can negotiate freely and without major costs, it does not really matter which part initially has the right of ownership since in the end it will remain in the hands of those who value it most. The final result of the negotiation will lead us to an optimal allocation of resources.
Property rights indicate who owns or has permission to do something.
Answer: She updates her online profile regularly and participates in work related online discussions.
Explanation:
Answer: $16,925.90 increase
Explanation:
Company already has the excess capacity to handle this order so the fixed costs will not be included as they would have already been incurred.
Cost of manufacturing the trees would be:
= Variable cost + Fixed cost
= ((51.61 + 3.80 + 1.00 + 8.26 for white tree) * 230 trees) + 5,000 for molds
= (64.67 * 230) + 5,000
= $19,874.10
Incremental revenue = 230 trees * 160
= $36,800
Incremental operating income = 36,800 - 19,874.1
= $16,925.90 increase
<em></em>
<em>Note: Options might be for a variant of this question. </em>
Answer:
Chocolates R' Us, Inc.
Family hostility cannot be used as an argument to void the family attribution rules.
Lucy is still legally married to Desi. What the husband, Desi, therefore, owes, she owes equally despite their separation and her intention to reduce her ownership in their joint company.
Explanation:
Family Attribution Rules: Section 318 of the Internal Revenue Code says an individual shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his spouse and his children, grandchildren, and parents, including legally adopted children.
