answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Cloud [144]
2 years ago
11

In at least one hundred words describe how bly uses sarcasm in his poetry to evince an emotion reaction from his readers. How is

this emotional reaction strengthened by bly’s ironic language and imagery
English
1 answer:
svetlana [45]2 years ago
3 0

I do not know the poems by Robert Bly that you have read in class, but I would argue that in poems such as "A Dream on the Night of First Snow," for instance, the author uses a very graphic, visual, and arguably sarcastic language when talking about his dream - he first mentions a girl whom he met in an attic and who "talked of operas, intensely," and he abruptly changes topics and goes on to refer to his happily encounter with a salamander (which seems to have amused him more than the girl) and to describe, meticulously and almost humorously, the way the little creature "strode over a log" and left. One can clearly picture the salamander striding "confidently like a chess master" and rising up "like a tractor," and almost feel for it, while one can also smile slightly thinking of the girl who talked intensely about operas and was left alone by the speaker in the attic while she continued to do so.

Another example of Bly's use of imagery and sarcasm with the goal of evincing an emotional reaction can be identified in "The Bear and the Man," which brings a bear closer to a man, and vice versa, by referring to a loss that both of them have experienced: the death of their respective sons. Ironically, the bear's son was killed by a trap, set (it can be inferred) by a man, and the man's son, who was inebriated and alone in the woods, was killed by a bear. The bear knows "his kin," abandoned down jackets among them, and so does the man, although the speaker seems to imply that the former knows more than the latter. They face each other and may fight at any moment, but the speaker, instead, reminds the reader that they share a grandmother (a reference to the Ursa Major or Great Bear) that watches them closely from the sky, in an attempt, perhaps, to reconcile them.            

You might be interested in
Drag each tile to the correct box.
monitta

Answer:

well known for having a bad reputation- infamous

a religious belief that contradicts church doctrine-  heresy

administration- regime

a person who does not believe in God- atheist

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Please help me out!!
EleoNora [17]

the 4th option. The tent was not large enough to fit the girls sleeping bags

8 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt from “My Lord Bag of Rice.”
noname [10]

Answer: A

Explanation:

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the conflict between the twins resolved? What does the resolution suggest about the Iroquois’ view of both twins? Support
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

The conflict between the twins is resolved with the defeat of Flint, the twin for evil purposes. This kind of resolution shows that for the Iroquois the twins had a strong influence on our world, but even though the twin is barely influential, he is not pareo to defeat the good twin

Explanation:

The Iroquois explained the creation of the world through a myth that explained that everything we know in the world was created by two divine twins called Sapling and Flint. Sampling was kind and created everything good that we know in nature, but Flint was mean and modified his brothers' creations by adding bad elements, such as winter and fish bones.

For the Iroquois, the twins represented good and evil. One day, they went to war and although the evil twin has great strength, he was defeated by the good twin, however it is still possible to feel Flint's evils through volcanic eruptions.

4 0
1 year ago
Read the following reason that has been given to justify slavery and answer the question.
professor190 [17]

Answer: We are not initially responsible for the capture of slaves taken as a result of war.

The first statement disputes the claim because it argues that captives from wars might still be taken in an unjust way. The third statement similarly disputes the claim by arguing that not all captives are victims of combat, but some were kidnapped despite their peaceful existence. Finally, the last statement argues that even if captives were taken lawfully in those wars, it would still be a great kindness to help them.

The second statement, on the other hand, supports the claim. It argues that the capture of slaves is not our responsibility, as they have been lawfully taken during war.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need a sentence with the words drawbacks and counterpoint are in please
    11·2 answers
  • How does Poe refine the idea in the poem "Annabel Lee" that true love never dies?
    7·2 answers
  • Explain why CD-ROM and online references are considered “multimedia.”
    13·2 answers
  • Read the following paragraph. Identify any misplaced or dangling modifiers you see. On the lines below, rewrite each one of the
    5·1 answer
  • Which descriptions best characterize the young Dr. Jekyll?
    13·2 answers
  • Questions 1–9: Write down the pronouns you find in each sentence. Indicate whether each pronoun is personal, interrogative, inde
    15·2 answers
  • Record one piece of evidence that best describes Major Kovaloff.
    8·2 answers
  • 3. Revise the following paragraph from a student essay. Focus on making the main claim clearer, strengthening the evidence, and
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these most closely matches the tone of the passage?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following sentences uses passive voice? Multiple areas for improvement have been identified by Robert's team. Rober
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!