All categories

2 years ago

Travis is employed in a logistics company. How can he best avoid workplace hazards?

Business

2 answers:

adoni [48]2 years ago

6 0

<h2>Answer : B, avoiding hazardous work.</h2>

Because when working for a logistics company. There are other ways than endangering yourself on the roads and have safety inside the co building. (wearing googles and such)

<h3 />

dolphi86 [110]2 years ago

5 0

On of the very basic measures, Travis must do in order to avoid workplace hazards is to perform safety precautions before working. These safety precautions basically involve the use of safety goggles. The safety goggles would provide protection of the eye against chemicals that might spill.

You might be interested in

You are analyzing Jillian’s Jewelry (JJ) stock for a possible purchase. JJ just paid a dividend of $1.50 yesterday. You expect t

disa [49]

Answer:

A. D1 = 1.50*1.06 = 1.59

D2 = 1.59*1.06 = 1.69

D3 = 1.69*1.06 = 1.79

B. PV of D1=(1.50*1.06)/1.13^1=1.41

PV of D2=(1.50*1.06^2)/1.13^2=1.32

PV of D3=(1.50*1.06^3)/1.13^3=1.24

PV of all dividend = (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1 + (1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2 + (1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3

PV of all dividend = 1.59/1.13 + 1.6854/1.2769 + 1.786524/1.442897

PV of all dividend = 1.407079646 + 1.319915 + 1.238150748

PV of all dividend = 3.965145814288893

PV of all dividend = 3.97

C. PV = 27.05/(1+13%)^3

PV = 27.05/(1.13)^3

PV = 27.05/1.442897

PV = 18.74701

PV = 18.75

D. The most you should pay for it :

= (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1+(1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2+(1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3+27.05/1.13^3

=22.71

E. Value = (1.50*1.06)/(13%-6%)

Value = 1.59 / 7%

Value = 1.59 / 0.07

Value = 22.714286

Value =22.71

F. No, the value is not dependent on the holding period, you can see from above that the value of infinite time period estimated in E equals to the value calculated when there was 3 years holding period.

5 0

2 years ago

Johnson is an executive vice president at Conecom Hardware. He researches a proposal by a larger company, Openlane Hardware, to

WARRIOR [948]

Answer: Turn down the acquisition offer and prepare to resist a hostile takeover.

Explanation:

Since Johnson analysed the past performance of Openlane hardware and found out that past performance, conducting focus groups, and interviewing Openlane employees, Johnson concludes that the company has poor profit margins, sells shoddy merchandise, and treats customers poorly, then Johnson and Conecom Hardware should turn down the acquisition offer and prepare to resist a hostile takeover.

In this case, the merge between the companies will have a negative impact on Johnson and Conecom hardware due to the fact that the company has a bad reputation already and this can have an effect on Conecom. Therefore, the acquisition offer should be turned down.

5 0

2 years ago

Based on a predicted level of production and sales of 21,000 units, a company anticipates total variable costs of $105,000, fixe

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

The budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units is $155,800

Explanation:

According to the Given Scenario the Following are Computation to find out the budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units.

$Current Contribution Margin = \frac{Fixed Cost + Operating Income}{No of Unit Sold}$

Current Contribution Margin =$25,200 + $147,000/21,000

Current Contribution Margin = $172,200/21,000

Current Contribution Margin = $8.2 per Unit

The Contribution Margin for 19,000 units = $8.2 × 19,000

The Contribution Margin for 19,000 units = $155,800

Therefore, The budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units is $155,800

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Dove, Inc., had additions to retained earnings for the year just ended of $643,000. The firm paid out $40,000 in cash dividends,

Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Earnings for the year = Addition to retained earnings + Dividend paid = $643,000 + $40,000 = $683,000

a. Earnings per share = Earnings / No of shares = $683,000 / 750,000 = 0.91

Dividend per share = Dividend / No of shares = $40,000 / 750,000 = 0.05

Book value per share = Ending equity / No of shares = $7,380,000 / 750,000 = $9.84

b. Market price per share is 30.8. Market to book ratio = $30.80 / $9,84 = $3.13

c. Price earning ratio = $30.80/$0.91 = $33.82

Total sales = $10,680,000, Sales per share = 14.24

Price sales ratio = Market price / Sales = $30.80 / $14.24 = $2.16

3 0

2 years ago

Investment X offers to pay you $4,200 per year for eight years, whereas Investment Y offers to pay you $6,100 per year for five

marishachu [46]

Answer:

PVxa = $27,132.00, PVya = $26,413.00,

Explanation:

Present value (PV) is the value of the future expected cash flow. PV rests on the idea that the worth of a cash received is more than that of the cash promised to be received in the future. To calculate PV a stream of incomes to be received a number of period in the future, the following formula is used:

$PV = C[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n} }{r} ]$

Where PV = present value

C = cash flow amount from the investment

r = discount rate

n = number of period, in this case years, to receive the cash flow.

The PV formula above is therefore employed to answer the question as follows:

Answer to question (a)

For Investment X in question (a)

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxa = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.05)^-8]/0.05}

PVxa = $4,200 * 6.463212759

PVxa = $27,145.49

For Investment Y in question (a)

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVya = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.05)^-5]/0.05}

PVya = $6,100 * 4.329476671

PVya = $26,409.81

Answer to question (b)

For Investment X in question (b)

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVxb = $4,200 * {[1-(1+0.15)^-8]/0.15}

PVxb = $4,200 * 4.487321508

PVxb = $18,846.75

For Investment Y in question (b)

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+r)^-n]/r}

PVyb = $6,100*{[1-(1+0.15)^-5]/0.15}

PVyb = $6,100 * 3.352155098

PVyb = $20,448.15

Where PVxa, PVya, PVxb and PVyb represents PV for X and Y in questions (a) and (b).

Decisions:

1. In question (a) part where the PV of $27,145.49 of X is greater than $26,409.81 of investment Y, it is better to invest on investment X.

2. In question (b) part where the PV of $20,448.15 of Y is now greater than $18,846.75 of investment X, it is better to invest on investment Y.

7 0

2 years ago