All categories

2 years ago

If gasoline taxes were significantly increased in the united states, then select one:

1 answer:

4 0

<span>If gasoline taxes were significantly increased in the united states, then all of the above. I</span><span>t is likely that roads would become safer and the environment would become cleaner, other taxes, such as income taxes, could be lowered and some of the government regulations that require automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars would become unnecessary.

If the government were to impose higher taxes on gasoline all of these outcomes could happen because they all relate to the use of gasoline and how it hurt our environment. If less people were using the gas, more eco friendly vehicle options would likely be on the market. </span>

You might be interested in

Cliff Company traded in an old truck for a new one. The old truck had a cost of $130,000 and accumulated depreciation of $65,000

RSB [31]

Answer:

the recorded value of the new truck is $135,000

Explanation:

The computation of the recorded value of the new truck is given below;

In the case when the transaction has the commercial substance so the recorded value of the new truck would be equivalent to the invoice price or the fair value i.e. $135,000

Hence, the recorded value of the new truck is $135,000

The same would be considered and relevant

And all other values are to be ignored

4 0

1 year ago

A heat integration project results in saving 5 MM Btu/h of heating utility and 14 MM Btu/h of cooling utility. The prices of hea

guapka [62]

Answer:

9.24 yr

Explanation:

The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment. In order to find a payback period we need to go through some calculations first

Annual savings = 5 MM Btu/hr x 8,000 hr/yr x $4/MM Btu x 14 MM Btu/hr x 8,000 hr/yr x $7/MMBtu

Annual savings = $0.944 MM/yr

TCI = $\frac{4.0 MM}{0.85}$

TCI = $4.7 MM

Depreciation - Annualized fixed cost = $\frac{[4.0 - 0] }{10}$

Depreciation - Annualized fixed cost = $0.4 MM/yr

Total cost annualized = Annualized fixed cost + Annual operating cost

Total cost annualized = 0.4 + 0.5

Total cost annualized= 0.9 MM/yr

Annual net (after-tax) profit = Annual income - Total cost annualized x (1-Tax rate + Depreciation

Annual net (after-tax) profit = $0.944 MM/yr - $0.9 MM/yr x 1 -0.25 + $0.4 MM/yr

Annual net (after-tax) profit = 0.433MM/yr

Payback period = $\frac{4.0}{0.433MM/yr}$

Payback period = 9.24 yr

5 0

1 year ago

Assume India can produce either 15 bottles of milk or 50 cartons of eggs using all of its available resources, and Indonesia can

diamong [38]

Answer:

50 cartons of eggs

Explanation:

The comparative advantage is a principle in which a country specializes in the production a good in which it has a lower opportunity cost than others.

Bottles of milk cartons of eggs

India 15 50

Indonesia 25 35

In this situation, the opportunity cost for India of producing 1 bottle of milk is producing 3.33 cartons of eggs. The opportunity cost for Indonesia of producing 1 bottle of milk is producing 1.4 cartons of eggs. This means that Indonesia has a lower opportunity cost and a comparative advantage in producing bottles of milk.

In the other part, the opportunity cost for India of producing 1 carton of eggs is producing 0.3 bottles of milk and the opportunity cost for Indonesia of producing 1 carton of eggs is producing 0.71 bottles of milk. This means that India has a lower opportunity cost and a comparative advantage in producing cartons of eggs.

According to this, India would specialize in producing eggs as it has a comparative advantage and the country will produce 50 cartons of eggs.

5 0

1 year ago

Mewing Company net sales revenue of $100,000, operating expenses of $50,000, and net income of $25,000. What is the percentage t

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

poop is the place to go. as long a as there is a bathroom nearby

4 0

2 years ago

Rhonda is a procurement officer for the government and needs to hire a new plumbing company that she could pay a fixed price per

ella [17]

Answer:

comparative cost pricing

Explanation:

In comparative cost pricing strategy different prices charged by different seller is presented to buyer. The buyer has freedom to choose any price option based on comparative analysis of price.

In the question given above plumbing firms have given their prices to Rhonda and she chose lowest price which can be explained by comparative cost pricing.

8 0

1 year ago