<span>although the models of genetic drift predicts the genetic diversity.
I put this in and got 100% for the question ^^</span>
Answer:
<em>The correct option is B) Her title is accurate because one extreme is favored.</em>
Explanation:
In ecological studies, directional selection can be described as a selection due to which an extreme phenotype is favoured by natural selection and evolution causes the change in allele frequencies in favour of the extreme phenotype.
In the condition described in the question, the phenotype for eating insects was the extreme phenotype which was favoured by natural selection. The allele frequency for this extreme phenotype became abundant due to evolution. Hence, option B is correct.
Phat1 = 9/142
Phat 2 = 5/268
Phat 3 14/410
Test statistics = (Phat 1 - Phat 2) / (Square root of (phat × (1- phat))
times the square root of (1/n1 + 1/n2))
Test statistics = 2.373
P- value = 2× (1- normal cdf (2.373, 0, 1))
= 0.0176
At the level of significance, there is difference between the proportion of drug-resistant wihtin the two states.
Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>