The diction of Steinbeck here in apparently describing the dustbowl conditions of the Dirty Thirties is speaking of "tenant men" or presumably men who were tenant farmers perhaps who were allowed to live on the land in return for working it and that they "scuffed" their way home indicates that the dust was so thick they had to scuff but also perhaps that since they could barely make a living under the poor agricultural conditions they did not walk confidently but scuffed.
.......................................................................................................................................................,,,,,,,,
Essay claim: Requiring <em><u>voters</u></em> to <u><em>present picture</em></u> identification <u><em>reduces</em></u> voter participation.
<em><u>Many</u></em> people <u><em>lack</em></u> photo identification. Requiring <em><u>picture identification to vote would keep those without</u></em> it from voting. Elderly <em><u>people who no longer drive and people </u></em>who <em><u>live </u></em>in<em><u> low-income</u></em> areas often <em><u>lack</u></em> identification. They would be <em><u>unable</u></em> to vote. Mark Abernathy <u><em>argues</em></u>, "Requiring photo ID to vote <em><u>effectively</u></em> eliminates a <em><u>large group</u></em> of American voters. <em><u>However</u></em>, they are denied a basic <em><u>privilege given to all Americans over the age of 18</u></em>. A <em><u>part</u></em> of the population, not the entire population, <em><u>decides</u></em> elections" <em><u>" (page 820 of the article "Photo Identification Disenfranchisement").</u></em> Some <u><em>believe</em></u> this <em><u>isn't </u></em>true. Ria Olberson <em><u>of</u></em> Alabaster University <em><u>says</u></em>, "Few Americans <em><u>lack</u></em> a license. Even <em><u>an</u></em> expired or revoked license <em><u>counts as photo identification.</u></em> The<em><u> idea</u></em> that requiring <em><u>identification disenfranchises some Americans is </u></em>simply <em><u>false</u></em> " (page 101). Just just wrong! <em><u>Many people don't have licenses because they</u></em> don't need or <em><u>desire</u></em> them. Consider <em><u>city dwellers</u></em>. They <em><u>don't need</u></em> licenses: public transportation. <em><u>Many</u></em> of <em><u>these</u></em> people would <em><u>have</u></em> to <em><u>get</u></em> licenses in <em><u>order to participate in a process</u></em> <em><u>that they are entitled </u></em>to<em> </em>as <em><u>U.S.</u></em> citizens.