Answer:
Gain the attention of the audience
Explanation:
In any given speech it is of the utmost importance to establish contact with the public. Asking intriging questions is very effective and stimulates (by provoking human curiosity) the attention of the audience. Who can deny that he/she is tempted to continue to listen to a possible explanation of his/her own personal anxiety?
Answer:
Reflecting feelings or reflection of feelings
Explanation:
When someone reflects on another person's underlying feeling in a statement to that same person that they are engaging in reflecting feelings or reflection of feelings. This is normally done by psychologist or by someone who is trying to educate someone in regards to their behavior. These underlying feelings are often reflected through behavior, way of talking and body language and therefore, can be an important tool for parents and teachers to evaluate children and assist them in understanding and regulating their feelings.
Answer:
Peer group
Explanation:
Peer group -
It refers to the combination of people , combined together because of some common interest , is referred to as a peer group.
This group tries to attract and influences other person to join and follow their group .
A peer group can be good as well as bad in belief .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is peer group .
Answer:
- When making an analysis and map of another person’s argument, you should correct obvious mistakes.
- In analyzing and mapping the statements in an argument, context is not important.
Explanation:
The argument map is made to present a visual representation of the structure of an argument, showing all the premises, objections, counter-arguments, themes and statements that led to the construction of the given argument. This type of representation is used to support the reasoning and critical thinking of whoever is analyzing the argument.
In this case, whoever analyzes the arch for the construction of maps, must not correct errors, even small and perceptible errors, but must build the map the way the argument was built, even with its mistakes and successes. The context of the argument is very important at this point, since without the context, it is impossible to determine the reasoning and thinking that composed the argument.
