<span>Since humanism was conceived in the early 20th century rejected revealed knowledge, theism-based morality and the supernatural.</span>
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
<span>The answer would be situational variables</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is Obliteration
Explanation:
Obliteration means eradication, erasure.
Something that is obliterated means that it is gone.
In sociology, the word obliteration can take many connotations, one of them being cultural obliteration.
Cultural obliteration usually occurs when a person moves to a country that has a cultural context that they are not used to but end up adapting said culture. What happens with their original cultural identity is known as Obliteration. It can also happen when a person adopts their partners' cultural identity while sacrificing their own.
In this particular case, Keiko grew in Japan and Wahid in Egypt.
They got married in the United States and they decided to stay there and "become American" rather than negotiate the differences between their two cultures. This scenario exemplifies obliteration.
Answer:
Dominance
Explanation:
Purple flowers are dominating character while white flowers are recessive ones. If you have a Punnet's square, you'll see the results as 3:1 where 3 is of purple flowers (2 heterozygous + 1 homozygous) and 1 is of homozygous white flowers. Thereby, seeing dominance.
if there were pink flowers, then it would be the case of co-dominance.
a dihybrid cross is only made when there are 2 characters like pod size and pod colour.
Hope this'll help:)
