Answer:
Yes. She is guilty of patchwork plagiarism.
Explanation:
According to the text in the question, Sara has used large sections of three different sources by cutting and pasting them. She does not cite the sources and does not make an effort to use her own words or to use only a couple of lines from each source. When someone copies large portions of two or more sources and presents the result as their own work, we have a case of patchwork plagiarism. Therefore, Sara is guilty of that kind of plagiarism.
<span>In the 1st half of the 20th century, there were 2 World Wars. Because of that the poetry contains more emotion, so the poetry in that period is a lot heavier.
</span>
Answer: If you wouldn't say it to there face don't say it online.
Explanation: When you say something to someone in person you are most likely to not say anything rude or be overly opinionated, you might fight or argue but when online people tend to say nasty stuff. For example let's say someone looks bad, in person you would probably just ignore it but online a person would say you look bad or clean yourself up. That would make someone feel bad about themself, or they would believe you. If you ignored it online they would feel better that your not beating them up for it. The concept is to only say online what you would say in person.
B - We can no longer ignore that voice withing women that says; I want something more than my husband and my children and my home,
This is the best argument to support Friedan's argument that feminine fulfillment does not come from domesticity as she wants something more than husband, children, and home (the definition of domesticity)
