Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Answer:
"A pall-like silence fell upon the patrons of the game"
Explanation:
Something pall is something dark, gloomy, related to sadness and death. This shows conflict as the narrator is describing a match in which everything could be defined by the last inning. "we'd put up even money now, with Casey at the bat". "clung to the hope...". That moment will be defined by the outcome of that last inning. That's why a "pall-like" silence fell upon the patrons of the game. Because everything will be defined after.
The fundamental message of the story is that captivation doesn't generally break even with genuine romance. We would all be able to feel for the young lady in the story who is complimented by the young fellow's consideration. He is a quintessential tease; his initially signal is to enclose his arms warmly and defensively around her midriff when he inquires as to whether she minds him skating with her. He takes order of every circumstance, is firmly mindful to her, and converses with her in a private way. The young lady falls hard for him, yet this is just an amusement for somebody who is known as a 'top dog' in school and the 'best artist around the local area.'
She is infatuated to the point that she trusts him when he says he will call. In any case, she is soon disillusioned and takes in reality that each young person in the long run gets: an ace tease regularly knows how to control the feelings of others further bolstering his good fortune, however it never prompts a promising relationship for the person who trusts.
Concerning word decision, the creator cunningly utilizes some viable scholarly gadgets to depict the failure and torment of a youthful heart. No where is this more clear than in the last passage.
Tonight is Tuesday. Tonight is Tuesday and my homework is done and I darned some stocking that truly didn't require it, and I worked a cross-word perplex and I tuned in to the radio and now I'm quite recently sitting. I'm quite recently sitting since I can't consider whatever else to do.
The utilization of anaphora (as in the words "today around evening time" and 'I') and anadiplosis (as in the expression 'I'm recently sitting') features a great deal of reiteration on the young lady's part; her nervousness is horrendously clear. She is essentially recently captivating in monotonous, careless assignments to relax on the off chance that the young fellow calls. At last, she understands that
For out of the blue, I know, I realize what the stars knew all the time - he will never, never call - never.
The redundancy of "never" ( epimone) and "know" features the young lady's mental and enthusiastic anguish. Each "never" resembles a throbbing injury; the young fellow has let her down horrendously, and it harms.
Answer:
I agree with the statement.
Explanation:
An erudite is someone of great knowledge.
If Ichabod has been recorded to have read several books, then for sure it has increased his knowledge bank, making him more learned in different things so he is a man of great erudition.
Books contain a whole lot of information in them that an avid reader will read and become more knowledge.
