Answer:
Unmanaged development like that traditionally used in the mining industries in developing countries are an example of the destruction that this development can cause. If not regulated, this industry can damage the local environment.
Explanation:
Unmanaged development can lead to a lot of unsustainable practices that do little to benefit the local population where the development project is transpiring for example. An example would be mining companies that enter a country that is mineral rich like Peru and that pay the national government for the right to mine minerals and precious and semi-precious metals from the subsoil. However, if unmanaged, the mining company will make use of local water supplies that can affect surrounding communities. They also tend to pay local workers less and they do not offer them benefits for the long term health effects that can come from working in the mining industry. There are fewer protections for workers and local populations in countries where there is less regulation. This can have a negative impact on the local population and the local environment by contaminating land and water, for example.
The correct answer is the conflict theory of political and economic systems.
The conflict theory of political and economic systems is a theory which states that power and wealth lie in the hands of few members of society because there are limited resources available, and thus, constant competition to acquire these resources. Due to this, Ajay (who believes in the conflict theory of political and economic systems) would believe that<span> power is concentrated among a small group of elites who are involved in a constant struggle to keep their power from the non-elites. </span>
Option A
These include athletes being more extraverted and conscientious and less neurotic than non athletes
<u>Explanation:</u>
The athletes have a more formidable spirit, more prolonging, greater self-conceit, and a more powerful strength goal than non-athletes. Athletes have added positive oneself features than non-athletes. Athletes vary from nonathletes on multiple personality attributes. One of the several constant conclusions is that athletes are higher extraverted and slightly erratic than non-athletes.
Still, there is a more limited understanding of how personality changes from sport to sport. Athletes who compete in crew and specific sports are more confident, stronger unbiased, and few afraid than nonathletes
