Briefly explain why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

2 answers:

4 0

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted in order to address and refine the problems of a specific argument. To critique an argument also eliminates biases in order to make the argument valid. It should also pass a certain standard to make it qualified for acceptance.

Alenkasestr [34]2 years ago

3 0

To be accepted, a scientific argument must first proved it's solidity and validity and critiques from other expert is usually the best way to explain both the solidity and the validity of a scientific argument

hope this helps

You might be interested in

The rod and cone cells are located within which layer of the eye?

bulgar [2K]

sclera choroid, also known as the choroidea or choroidcoat, is the vascular layer of the eye, containing connective tissues, and lying between the retina and the sclera.

6 0

2 years ago

Kesav used to grow pea plant in his field after the harvesting of paddy. What do you think the advantage of this type of croppin

Nina [5.8K]

Kesav will Planting nitrogen-fixing crops, such as peas, in rotation with wheat crops can dramatically reduce the variability of farmers' income with a high-yield, high-protein harvest. ... Instead, they depend on the presence of nitrogen as ammonium or nitrate ions in the soil.

8 0

2 years ago

Read It! Amateur astronomer and photographer Nick Risinger decided to try to capture an image of the entire sky. To do this, he

Dmitry [639]

He was C Determined This is because he kept on trying Hope this helps

5 0

2 years ago

Does plant food X have an effect on the production of tomatoes?

steposvetlana [31]

Hypothesis: If Plant Food X is used on a tomato plant, then production rate will increase.
experiment: Gather 2 tomato plants of the same height and age. Make two groups, a control group (a tomato plant without use of fertilizer) and an experimental group (a tomato plant with using Plant Food X).
For one week, give each plant the same amount of water, humidity, sunlight, and air temperature. after a week measure the height and number of tomatoes produced. gather the info in a table and compare to hypothesis after one week.

4 0

2 years ago

Gel analysis of fragments in step 6 shows that even though the undigested DNA and DNA digested with HindIII are both 1000 bp, th

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

Size of the band varied

Explanation:

In the given question, the options are not provided but based on the information provided in the question, it can be predicted.

When the DNA was digested by the HindIII, then the length of the digest came about 1000 bp and the undigested DNA was also found 1000 bp.

When both the bands were analysed by Gel electrophoresis then the bands do not run to the same distance therefore this shows that the size of both the bands was not equal and their size varied.

Thus, the size of the band varied is correct.

6 0

2 years ago