This statement is false.
Any time a writer paraphrases something he or she read somewhere, it means that he or she is paraphrasing somebody else's words, which means that person has to be credited for it. If the writer reached an opinion independently, then they wouldn't have to cite the source, but otherwise, they do, if they want to avoid plagiarism.
I believe that Polyphemus would most likely be your answer because he was the "Giant, Lawless Brute"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Charybdis❌
Polyphemus✅
The Lotus-Eaters❌
Proteus❌
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good Luck!
Answer:
1. allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence is lack of clear conclusion or opinions about an event. It allows the narrator to exaggerate and escape the judgement. The readers does not prefer authorial reticence as there is absence of clear judgement. There author can include fantasies and magics which will end up readers concluding things their own way. It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and clear conclusion is not given right way.
