All categories

2 years ago

How can the use of attention-attracting tactics backfire on an advertiser?

1 answer:

8 0

Attention-attracting tactics may backfire on an advertiser because they may attrack the attention of the wrong audience or the right, but then they do not keep their interest long enough to actually sell the product or serivce. It is important for an advertiser to do more then just grab their attention but fully 'sell' the product or service to the consumer or the advertising is a waste.

You might be interested in

Oddo's Pizza is a restaurant that recently implemented a new system to identify and gather information about its regular custome

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

I hate this answers yours

3 0

2 years ago

A monopolist sells 2,000 units for $20 each. The total cost of 2,000 units is $30,000. If the price falls to $19, the number of

leonid [27]

Answer:

Decrease by $1

Explanation:

Given:

Old data:

Q0 = 2,000 units

P0 = $20

Total revenue before change = 2,000 x $20 = $40,000

After change in Price.

Q1 = 2,100 units

P1 = $19

Total revenue After change = 2,100 x $19 = $39,900

Computation of Marginal Revenue:

Marginal Revenue = (P1 - P0) / (Q1 - Q0)

= ($39,900 - $40,000) / (2,100 - 2,000)

= -100 / 100

= $(-1)

Marginal revenue will decrease by $1

8 0

2 years ago

Be5-4, Prepare the journal entries to record the following transactions on Novy Company’s books using a perpetual inventory syst

Leto [7]

Answer:

a: March 2

Dr Accounts Receivable 900,000

Cr Sales Revenue 900,000

March 2

Dr Cost of Good Sold 590,000

Cr Inventory 590,000

b. March 6

Dr Sales Returns and Allowances 90,000

Cr Accounts Receivable 90,000

March 6

Dr Inventory 62,000

Cr Cost of Goods Sold 62,000

c. March 12

Dr Cash 793,800

Dr Sales Discount 16,200

Cr Accounts Receivable 810,000

Explanation:

Preparation of Journal entries using a perpetual inventory system

a. March 2

Dr Accounts Receivable 900,000

Cr Sales Revenue 900,000

(To record sale of merchandise)

March 2

Dr Cost of Good Sold 590,000

Cr Inventory 590,000

b. March 6

Dr Sales Returns and Allowances 90,000

Cr Accounts Receivable 90,000

(To record sale of merchandise)

March 6

Dr Inventory 62,000

Cr Cost of Goods Sold 62,000

c. March 12

Dr Cash 793,800

(98%*810,000)

Dr Sales Discount 16,200

(2%*810,000)

Cr Accounts Receivable 810,000

(900,000-90,000)

8 0

2 years ago

A monopolistic seller of sports cars has traced out the following demand curve: 10 customers have willingness to pay (WTP) of $1

Romashka [77]

Answer:

The answer is: 1) II > I > III

Explanation:

Pricing scheme I: $2 million profit

Price $150,000
Contribution margin = $150,000 - $50,000 = $100,000
35 units sold x $100,000 = $3.5 million
profit = $3.5 million - $1.5M = $2 million

Pricing scheme II: 2.25 million profit

Price $200,000
Contribution margin = $200,000 - $50,000 = $150,000
25 units sold x $150,000 = $3.75 million
profit = $3.75 million - $1.5M = $2.25 million

Pricing scheme III: $1.5 million profit

Price $250,000
Contribution margin = $250,000 - $50,000 = $200,000
15 units sold x $200,000 = $3 million
profit = $3 million - $1.5M = $1.5 million

8 0

2 years ago

Explain the role of cognitive shortcomings in the WorldCom fraud and how social and organizational pressures influenced Betty Vi

bulgar [2K]

Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.

* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.

Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false

6 0

2 years ago