<span>When Kristine Linde arrives at the Helmer's home, she is destitute and desperate, having lost her husband and her mother. She has returned with the goal of procuring employment and hopes that Torvald can find her a position at the bank. While Nora offers to ask her husband, she displays some resentment to her old friend, accusing her of patronizing her because she has not suffered want as she has.
</span>
Answer:
A. Selective.
Explanation:
This could be looked at in the sense of a little disorder from little Andrew, though the act is selective, it could also come up as mutuism. Some adults with selective mutism are fully capable of speech and understanding language but are physically unable to speak in certain situations, though speech is expected of them.
The behaviour may be perceived as shyness or rudeness by others. A child with selective mutism may be completely silent at school for years but speak quite freely or even excessively at home. There is a hierarchical variation among people with this disorder: some people participate fully in activities and appear social but do not speak, others will speak only to peers but not to adults, others will speak to adults when asked questions requiring short answers but never to peers, and still others speak to no one and participate in few, if any, activities presented to them.
Answer: confronting your own biases and prejudices related to these populations.
Explanation:
Several studies have found gaps in access and care on mental health, which leaves many minorities neglected.
One possible reason for differences in access is that providers and administrators of mental health programs make biased decisions based on race, gender or ethnicity. Biased opinions may be held knowingly or unconsciously.
Answer:
The guideline under this choice is that the first Amendment must ensure "unpopular opinion" offered that the larger part input is as of now secured. Regardless of whether Nazis intentionally picked a Jewish people group for their meeting, this was "serene" and the State reserved no option to forestall it. Besides, it makes a differentiation among activity and discourse, representative discourse, such as wearing Swastikas, is ensured as discourse and can't be prohibited or confined. The court concluded that it was desirable over permit this gathering to vent their scorn than to permit government to mention to residents what to think and state. This choice is significant, it made the way for emblematic discourse from numerous points of view, regardless of whether hostile for certain gatherings. Regardless of whether this is certain or negative relies upon out perspectives on freedom.
Both authors present a similar style by the time in which they lived. The 20th century poetry consisted of imaginary writing style becoming popular, as well as how it was related to the world war. Furthermore, the process of making the poetry sound biblical and remark the women’s rights became a popular tendency on literature at that time.
On the one hand T. S. Eliot considered a very important modernism poet, used to work with themes that rejected the traditional 19th norms and was orientated modernism through the use of fragmentation, free verse, contradictory illusions, metaphors as a poetic device, and multiple views on feeling by giving unanimated objects voice and perspectives as it can be appreciated in his poem “Rhapsody on a Windy Night”. Also, he worked with Victorian and romantic writing tones that can be noticed in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and “The Waste Land.”
On the other hand, Carl Sandburg, also implies different metaphors as poetic devices in his poems, in conjunction with Eliot, with the use of free verse, imagination, and comparisons by giving voice to objects and nature components, such as rivers and mountains. For instance, Carl's idyllic style emerged from numerous different artists on account of its absence of frame and structure. The greater part of his lyrics appear as though he's coolly portraying a theme. As appeared in the lyric "Passing Snips Proud Men", Sandburg utilizes a considerable measure of easygoing word use and slang.
This free verse and lack of a structure, along with the imaginary use of metaphors and reality are the points were both authors meet each other’s writing style.
