Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
The scientific thinker that had direct problems with the Catholic Church because of his science was Galileo!
Answer:
Only 1) is true because selective reporting data is not considered to be UNETHICAL in research behavior BUT non-existent data is UNETHICAL.
Explanation:
Selective reporting of data is a process where by results are reported based on selections made from the study. It involves tweaking hypothesis made from the study.
Non- existent data is where results that are not from the original study are added to the result.
The answer is: Communication.
In this scenario, Denyce used a very important kind of leadership technique, which is communication. Especially when leadership is shared, when there are other people who have to decide, too. it is necessary to know how to communicate. The proposal was on the table to be decided by the group, for this reason denyce had to ask his colleagues his ideas on the subject. An efficient leader knows how to handle all kinds of communication, such as group / departmental communication, one-to-one. As she was in a group, she used something very important in leadership, which is listening. She encouraged communication in the group, facilitating communion among them, in order to get to a common sense.
Answer:
Overall Sammy's speech style is of modern nature influenced by the pop and hippie culture with a fear of commitment.
Explanation:
By analyzing the language of Sammy it is observed that Sammy has a overall witty nature where he is self aware and considers himself as of a superior specie than the mankind.
- His use of word witch in para 1 and the subsequent anger highlights the self awareness and how high he considers himself in his own point of view.
When talking to the girls for the first time, indicates a different side of Sammy which is more loving, romantic and has a sense of enjoyment.
- He often uses words as Darling, Sweet heart while calling the women.
Throughout the story it is also evident that the emphasis is given more towards the talking as compared to listening. This is also highlighting his self centric attitude towards the life and has a careless attitude which is covered with the facade.
In addition there is usage of slangs at different paras which highlights his modern and care-free attitude.
