answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ss7ja [257]
2 years ago
4

Describe how the Netherlands established territorial claims in North America. Include these terms in your answer: Henry Hudson,

Peter Stuyvesant
History
2 answers:
Aliun [14]2 years ago
6 0

The explorations of Henry Hudson established the territorial claims of the Dutch in North America. Peter Stuyvesant, was the New Amsterdams, grouchy, often disliked Governor. Peter Minuit bought the island of Manhattan from the Native Americans.

           Hope this helps!

Guest
1 year ago
yes thank you
rjkz [21]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:  The Netherlands established territorial claims in North America, in the New Netherlands, a territory they colonized by sending the expeditionary Henry Hudson, who discovered the river that would later bear his name (Hudson River); The claims were made to the English, with whom they fought battles to consolidate the businesses of the East India Company, with New Amsterdam as the main focus, which would later be known as New York and which would finally be under the dominion of the English and the defeat of Peter Stuyvesant, who was in charge of the Amsterdam government and had no choice but to give it to England since its inhabitants did not fight to defend their territory.

You might be interested in
Using four or more complete sentences, differentiate between nationalism and Islamism. Describe why these two concepts emerged a
anastassius [24]

Both, nationalism and Islamism, were ways that were used by the authorities of the newly formed countries for unification and strengthening the position of the nation, and the politicians as well.

Nationalism was based on ethnic level, and it was a way of creating despise, revolt, anger, towards the other nations. It was used as a unification method and for creating a nationalist core, and in this way the authorities were able to create a large mass of people that were willing to fight for their own nation, and had a deep hatred towards the other nations.

Islamism was based on religious level, and it was promoting unification on religious basis, but was also creating lots of hatred and aggression towards other religions. In this way, the authorities were trying to create a strong religious core in the country, but also brotherly alliances with the countries that practice the same religion.

Both, nationalism and Islamism were terrible towards the minorities, and the nationalist were killing and committing genocides on ethnic level, while the Islamist were doing the same but on religious level.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What problems do Mchanagma and Verdirame see with the current state of human rights in the international system in their article
sineoko [7]

Answer and Explanation:

Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”

We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.

The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.

They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is  buy cover for dictatorships ”

Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.

To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.

8 0
2 years ago
Determine whether the following characteristics describe conditions in Germany before or after unification.
Gelneren [198K]

Answers, with explanations:

written constitution = after unification

  • During revolutions in 1848-1849, the Frankfurt Parliament had produced a constitution for a unified Germany, but that move was rejected at the time by the king of Prussia, to whom the constitution was offered. 

300 German states = before unification

  • The German states had a long history of sovereignty in their individual territories.  Unification meant bringing all those states together into one national entity.

trade facilitated in the region = before unification

  • The Zollverein, or customs union, was created between the German states in the 1830s.  This eliminated customs tariffs between states and was a step that began moving in the direction of unification.

risk of French aggression = before unification

  • Germany became a united empire after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71. Victory over France in that war by the German states operating as a coalition was part of what brought about unification.

boundaries changed by Napoleon = before unification

  • When Napoleon conquered territories throughout Europe in the early 1800s, he rearranged borders to enhance his empire's management of conquered territories. In the German states, this made them work together in ways they had not before, and was a catalyst toward desires for unification.

two-house legislature = after unification

  • There was a legislature in the North German Confederation (1867-1870), which preceded unification.  But that was a single-house (unicameral) parliament, whereas the Reichstag (legislature) of the unified German Empire was bicameral.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
Leokris [45]
The answer is C because in the constitution it allowed the states to choose and make their own laws and slavery was a law that the southerners wanted.
6 0
2 years ago
Maura is making a timeline of important events in Texas history during 1835. Which event should she put last on the timeline?
Gnoma [55]

Answer: C. Leasers Decide To Meet At The Consultation.

Explanation: To start with it is best to know when each incident occurred.

A. Texas Troops Take San Antonio - December 1835

B. The Battle Of Gonzales Is Fought - October 2, 1835

C. Leaders Decide To Meet At The Consultation - March 1936

D. William Travis Leads An Insurrection At Anahuac - June 1835

From here you put things in order of occurrence.

D. William Travis first lead an insurrection at Anahuac.

B. Then the Battle of Gonzales occurred.

A. Next Texas troops take over San Antonio.

C. Finally, leaders decide to meet at the Consultation.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Epidemics like smallpox often spread rapidly and wiped out entire native tribes. Why weren’t these diseases as fatal for the Spa
    14·1 answer
  • How did the plague help lead to an economic collapse in the third century
    9·1 answer
  • Why did many african americans migrate to cities like richmond, atlanta, and charleston?
    8·2 answers
  • Nutraplus manufactures dietary supplements. each workstation is self-contained, and a product goes to whichever workstation is n
    9·1 answer
  • The principles of roman Catholicism require followers to do all of the following except
    12·2 answers
  • What details or elements of the Sybille de Cummes make it a renaissance painting?
    14·1 answer
  • Identify which policies and organizations were created during Hoover's term as president by dragging each one to the appropriate
    14·2 answers
  • Westernization commonly is referred to as Americanization. Please select the best answer from the choices provided. T F
    11·2 answers
  • The Federalists would agree with which of the following items in regard to the structure of the American government?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following developments in the late fifteenth century could best be used as evidence to support Darwin's argument in
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!