All categories

1 year ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ASAP!! Read the following excerpt from “Homecoming.”

2 answers:

7 0

The answer is A due to the fact that the Navajo didn't reject the idea of education, it isn't speaking about removal from homes or boarding schools, and the conflict isn't mentioned within this excerpt.

astraxan [27]1 year ago

4 0

Answer:

The struggle of the Navajo to retain their culture and traditions is correct

Explanation:

Pls give brainliest

You might be interested in

Discuss what Bass and Riggio (2006) and what Lowe and Gardner (2001) define as the reasons why this leadership style is so impor

DochEvi [55]

Answer:

Bass and Rigirio: the importance was due to intrinsic motivation and follower development because these fit the needs of work groups.

*Lowe and Gardner: found that 1/3 of the research was transnational of charismatic

Explanation:

8 0

1 year ago

What is the coast-guard’s initial opinion of the Geatland sailors? How does he react to their sudden arrival? Use evidence from

Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

1. The coast-guard thought of them as enemies or intruders. Evidence from the text to this was when he asked:

'Who are ye men here, mail-covered warriors,

Clad in your corslets, come thus a-driving

A high riding ship o'er the shoals of the waters,

And hither 'neath helmets have hied o'er the ocean?

I have been strand-guard, standing as warden,

Lest enemies ever anywise ravage

2. On seeing the Geatland warriors arrive the coastland, the coast-guard rose in suspense and boldness and moved quickly to question the sailors on what their mission to the Dane was. Evidence from the text to this is in the statement:

"High on his horse then, Hrothgar's retainer

Turned him to coastward, mightily brandished

His lance in his hands questioned with boldness"

Explanation:

1. From the poem, Beowulf, we learn of the moment when Beowulf arrived at the coastland. The initial opinion of the guard about the unexpected warriors was that they were enemies or intruders who have probably come to spy on the Dane Kingdom. That was why he first asked them:

'Who are ye men here, mail-covered warriors,

Clad in your corslets, come thus a-driving

A high riding ship o'er the shoals of the waters,

And hither 'neath helmets have hied o'er the ocean?

I have been strand-guard, standing as warden,

Lest enemies ever anywise ravage

2. On sighting them, the guard rose in suspense arming himself with some armaments and went on to question them on who they were and what they had come to do in the Kingdom. The pieces of evidence are in these lines:

"High on his horse then, Hrothgar's retainer

Turned him to coastward, mightily brandished

His lance in his hands questioned with boldness"

6 0

1 year ago

Allen presents a counterargument involving respect for the flag at the beginning of the editorial. How does this contribute to t

viva [34]

This question is about the article "American flag stands for tolerance"

Answer and Explanation:

Allen shows that he believes that an individual can present better ways to show his discontent with the government instead of disrespecting the national flag by burning it, with that, we can see that he does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision to allow the burning of flags is a fair protest against the government, but quickly Allen claims that the Supreme Court is correct in allowing this, since even presenting a form of disrespect, the burning of flags is part of a peaceful protest, in addition to allowing freedom of expression in the country.

This shows that Allen's arguments are based on the country's ethical and legal standards and not on his own opinions, or on the sentimetalism he may feel for national symbols. He addresses the counterargument as a justification as to why he should not evaluate the Supreme Court's permission, but rather support it. This can be seen through the paragraph:

"The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations [...] iven the widespread and deeply felt reverence for this symbol of what we perceive to be the best of our civilization, what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it? [...] Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways.

The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations. A commitment to the intertwined freedoms of conscience and expression is at the core of those aspirations. What most distinguishes our civilization from both its predecessors and its contemporary competitors is a belief in the sanctity of the human conscience. Each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom. That requires not just the right to be let alone, but also the right to communicate with, to learn from and test views in conversations."

4 0

2 years ago

In The Earth is Precious, Chief Seattle says that man did not “weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.” What attitud

makvit [3.9K]

The white man's ways of not respecting the earth

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

A single mother is raising her child in a poor country that is ravaged by civil war. In an attempt to escape to a better life th

mash [69]

C)love is often demonstrated through personal sacrifice *apex*

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers