by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
<span>Gregor's father throws an apple at Gregor, and it gets stuck in his back.
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is Great care was taken to keep the truth from the public.
Explanation:
The ambulance members were trying not to be seen by any person when they were going to the monkey house. That's why they wore camouflaged suits, and no member of the ambulance wore the suit they should be wearing.
They even parked in the backyard of the house to avoid being seen.
All this is evidence that they wanted to hide the truth from the public.
Answer:
D. What if we come back to that after we discuss the author's perspective?
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A. Do you think the theme is primarily about finding one's personal identity?
B. What evidence from the book makes you think that?
C. Are you saying that the author is more credible because she's a scientist?
D. What if we come back to that after we discuss the author's perspective?
Out of these options, the best way to establish an objective during a discussion is option D. In option D, the speaker is clearly stating what he wants the purpose of the discussion to be. The speaker tells us that he would like to discuss the author's perspective. By clearly stating the objective in this way, the speaker can ensure that the conversation does not stray too far from the main issue that needs to be discussed.
The answer is C: A teacher assigns a 10 page research project and says, "this might take a little time".
An understatement is a statement that underplays the significance, value, size, relevance or importance of something and it makes it seem considerable less than what it actually is. In this example, the teacher makes it seem like writing a 10 page essay will take just “a little time”, when in fact, any student knows that a 10 page essay in a considerable enterprise that will take a lot more than just a little time.
