Answer:
The correct answer is C.
The author seeks to to make a comparison between Jekyll's transformation and real life.
Explanation:
In the case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Dr Henry Jekyll changes himself into an Edward Hyde an evil doer: the fall out of Dr Jekylls experiment.
At the end of the strange story, Dr Jekyll before his death wills his estate to his evil persona Edward Hyde.
So the article refers to this story with the intention to consider the extent to which the legal frameworks will permit the sort of transfer that happened between Jekyll and Hyde, were it to happen in real life.
Cheers!
Answer:
Sahil told Radhika that <em><u>he had invited four of his friends for dinner that day.</u></em>
Then Radhika said <em><u>she will also invite her friends</u></em>, which Sahil thought <em><u>would be a great idea</u></em>.
When Radhika asked <em><u>what they should have for dinner,</u></em> Sahil replied <em><u>they should decide the menu then.</u></em>
Explanation:
The given conversation is in the direct speech, meaning it is a real conversation with the speakers and the speeches in their respective names. But if we are to change it into the indirect or reported speech form, we have to change some aspects of the speeches. One is to remove the speech or direct format and write it in the reported form, and also some words such as "today" will be changed to "that day" and "now" will be changed to "then", etc.
Therefore, the given conversation in the reported form will be-
Sahil told Radhika that <em><u>he had invited four of his friends for dinner that day.</u></em>
Then Radhika said <em><u>she will also invite her friends</u></em>, which Sahil thought <em><u>would be a great idea</u></em>.
When Radhika asked <em><u>what they should have for dinner,</u></em> Sahil replied <em><u>they should decide the menu then.</u></em>
Answer: for part a the answer is murie curie broke gender buriers in the feild of science
for part b the answer is the curies were awarded the nobel prize for physics murie curie became the first women ever to win the nobel prize
Explanation: i did the test and got it right
Answer:
The excerpt from Enrique’s Journey tells a story about what happened to one victim, and “Children of the Drug Wars” uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.
Explanation:
Sonia Nazario's "Enrique's Journey" revolves around the journey that a young boy Enrique undertook to be united with his mother. The perilous journey led him through many unfortunate encounters which shows how people like Enrique had to endure to get safely to America illegally.
Damon Barrett's "Children of the Drug Wars" presents the all too familiar scenario of what children have to endure and encounter in their lives during the war with drugs and how it has an impact on them and their future lives.
While the <u>excerpt from "Enrique's Journey" tells of a single victim, the latter excerpt uses words to create an appealing emotional response to persuade readers to take action.</u> Enrique's encounter with the gangsters terrified him so much that he asked to be deported. On the other hand, the speaker of the latter book asks for children of drug wars to be allowed to be taken as refugees so that they need not <em>"make the perilous journey north alone"</em>.
