<span>D) Rukmani tries to stay in the village by offering to read villagers' letters for a small fee
</span>
"The situation made me think," can lead you into the conclusion that the answer your looking for is in that sentence. Usually when reflecting you can say, "I thought back to," or "I thought about". Also, it leads into the concluding sentence about how judging others is wrong, so it's the reflection before a decision.
TDLR; the answer is, "The situation made me think about how I..."
Hope this helps!!
<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
Answer:
See below:
Explanation:
A - Lawrence Kohlberg interviewed a group of young men about moral decision making.
D - Preconventional reasoning is based on following one’s moral principles, but Postconventional reasoning is based on doing what is best for oneself.
D - “Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first.” ( Paragraph 16)
B - Kohlberg could understand how people decided what was the right thing to do.
Write a summary of the article “How do we tell right from wrong?”
--> Sorry friend, you're going to have to write the summary yourself.
I hope this helps! I was not fully sure if the answer was C or D for the third question, but I put D because preconventional reasoning is external (if that makes sense). Have a good night!
- sincerelynini
Answer:
A. The simile compares the poison to a fast-moving, toxic element, emphasizing its deadliness.
Explanation:
The ghost doesn't compare the uncle to poison. Nor does he personify the vial. He is literally explaining how the uncle poisoned him by poured the poisonous plant hebona into his ear. Lastly, an apostrophe in literature is when you address someone who isn't there. The ghost isn't addressing the uncle. I believe he is speaking to Hamlet in this scene.
To highlight a character's (usually the protagonist's) personality, the introduction of a foil is used. In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet', Laertes is Hamlet's foil. They were childhood friends but have completely opposite traits and behaviors: Hamlet is verbal, he ponders, and is driven by passionate inaction, Laertes is physical, blusters, and is driven by passionate action.
In Act IV, scene V, we can see Laerts personality; he bursts and needs people to calm him down, whereas Hamlet would have stayed calm and think before acting.
