<span>Which poets address it in terms of the times they live in (and its threat of fascism) and which address it in a more personal way?
</span>
Answer: First we should know that both of these poet's had a bad experience in their lives, suffering similarly under tyranny and oppression during World War II, which shaped their perspective in very different ways. Milosz is the one that took it very personally and considered his life as emotionally destroyed while Szymborska looked at it as another chance at life that might never be given again. It is clear that the poet that addresses death in terms of the times they live in and as a threat of fascism is Milosz. This is apparent in the poem “City Without A Name”.
I hope this helps, Regards.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Who are listening to a guest speaker in history class
It could be said that this poem is about Native Americans, who are referred to "The Noble Savage" (option1). It portrays the spirit the Natives haunting their graves in the North American wilderness. It might be considered and American example of the Romantic movement.
The diction of Steinbeck here in apparently describing the dustbowl conditions of the Dirty Thirties is speaking of "tenant men" or presumably men who were tenant farmers perhaps who were allowed to live on the land in return for working it and that they "scuffed" their way home indicates that the dust was so thick they had to scuff but also perhaps that since they could barely make a living under the poor agricultural conditions they did not walk confidently but scuffed.
"The length of the text" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>s the least important aspect of a work to examine when evaluating an argument. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
