Answer:
Unmanaged development like that traditionally used in the mining industries in developing countries are an example of the destruction that this development can cause. If not regulated, this industry can damage the local environment.
Explanation:
Unmanaged development can lead to a lot of unsustainable practices that do little to benefit the local population where the development project is transpiring for example. An example would be mining companies that enter a country that is mineral rich like Peru and that pay the national government for the right to mine minerals and precious and semi-precious metals from the subsoil. However, if unmanaged, the mining company will make use of local water supplies that can affect surrounding communities. They also tend to pay local workers less and they do not offer them benefits for the long term health effects that can come from working in the mining industry. There are fewer protections for workers and local populations in countries where there is less regulation. This can have a negative impact on the local population and the local environment by contaminating land and water, for example.
The correct answer is letter B.
Privilege gives white people higher wages, greater access to education, and even more ability to stay alive.
Being one of the consequences of racial inequality in the country since the period of enslavement, white privilege is a silent, naturalized factor in daily life that conditions blacks to the worst conditions of life and guarantees whites easy access to various types of social advantages.
The reason that Shirley's testimony was invalid because she's a minor and by that, that memories about the robbery that she remembers could harm her and would most likely be susceptible to the suggestion. That is why the court would make her testimony as invalid and wouldn't consider it in any way even though she is the witness of the robbery.
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
