Answer:
hi i do dis for points i guess
Answer:
B. Look for a counselor, family therapist, or pastoral counselor who can provide effective support. or D. Switch from an authoritative to authoritarian parenting style.
Explanation:
you cant ground someone to go back to normal.
they must need help or something happened at school, and it somehow affected it, so talk with a counselor.
if you try to talk some sense into him- it'll probably get worse, considering he has changed and stopped talking to him.
my parents switch to an authoritative parenting style and it kinda has helped me, also, he will need to listen to them, and when he's at his weakest- he might break, so then he may tell you the problem.
The correct answer would be option D, Arnold's risk for coronary heart disease.
The nature of the physician's concern is Arnold's risk for coronary heart disease.
Explanation:
A coronary heart disease is a disease which builds up in a human body when the arteries of the heart become narrow. These are the coronary arteries, which becomes narrow due to this disease.
Coronary arteries are responsible for supplying oxygen and blood to the heart. So when these blood vessels become narrow, there will be problem in supplying oxygen and blood to the heart. The amount of oxygen and blood will decrease while passing through the narrow channel.
The Coronary Heart Disease is caused by high cholesterol levels, which gets stuck on the walls of the arteries and make them narrow. So because Arnold has a history of heart diseases, and also his cholesterol levels are not normal, and also he is over weight, so the physician is more concerned about the coronary heart disease.
Learn more about Coronary Heart Disease at:
brainly.com/question/3147927
#LearnWithBrainly
An ankle is a third class lever. FALSE
Answer:a. injury to a recipient of their services.
Explanation: Malpractice refers to how the councillor's practice leads to some sort of harm to their clients.
The councillor's advice (practice) has harmed this person. malpractice then means the councillor was negligent in their action or they are guilty of ommission , they didn't do something that might have prevented the injury.
The negligence might be the result of errors in diagnosis or treatments
