The reason that Shirley's testimony was invalid because she's a minor and by that, that memories about the robbery that she remembers could harm her and would most likely be susceptible to the suggestion. That is why the court would make her testimony as invalid and wouldn't consider it in any way even though she is the witness of the robbery.
Answer:
Group decision making provides two advantages over decisions made by individuals: synergy and sharing of information. Synergy is the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When a group makes a decision collectively, its judgment can be keener than that of any of its members.
Explanation:
Answer: This is how each person will be charged:
Principal = Harold
Accomplice=Marci
Accessory before the fact = Carl
Accessory after the fact=Shawn, David
Explanation:
Principal :
Is the person who commit the actual crime , Harold is the one who went inside and cracked the safe hence he is the one who commited the actual crime.
Accomplice:
This is the person who assists someone to commit a crime , Marci drove the van to the place where Harold will commit this crime so she provided him with the transport to go and commit burglary and she is the one who helped Harold get away .
Accessory before the fact:
This is a charge given to someone who encourages ,counsels and aids someone to commit a crime eventhough this person will not be physcally there at the scene. Carl is the one who told them where the vault is located which encouraged them more to commit this crimes because they were equipped with knowledge.
accessory after the fact
This is a charge given to someone who helps a person who has committed a crime eventhough they were also not there at the scene. Shawn is told by Harold that him and merci have commited burglary but he decided to help him get away instead of reporting the crime. David saw the crime being commited but still didn't say a thing to the police.
Answer: Investigators
Explanation:
investigators should monitor compensation, in other words, offer partial compensation for incomplete participation in specific study activities or work as a whole. Making receipt of compensation essential upon completion of all study activities may cause coercion or undue influence.
Bandura attributes aggressive behaviors to : The impact of observing models
Since we're little, we tend to observe the other people around us to determine how we should react to an event.
If for example, a child leave in a family that always act aggressive everytime small things happens, he will eventually grow up thinking that it's a proper way to deal with every small things that happen<span />
