answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alukav5142 [94]
2 years ago
13

in about 100 words analyze kennedy’s inaugural address his reasoning purpose and the way he uses literary devices and historical

references
History
2 answers:
allsm [11]2 years ago
0 0
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

Kennedy’s Inaugural has been a speech full of realism, idealism strength and historical reference.   He utilizes a method of Aristotle’s persuasive speech saying that he was the Democratic party’s candidate for president who happens also to be a Catholic.  

But, he said, he wasn’t the Catholic candidate for President. A beautiful rhetorical strategy in his Inaugural of 1961. Moreover his diction makes a strong role in this speech, infact words as freedom, poverty, loyalty are words  that can be related to everyone.

John F. Kennedy's Inaugural discourse was given on January twentieth, 1961. He addressed the natives of the United States, yet to the whole world. Obviously his principle objective was to bring together the whole human race and to improve the world a spot for everybody. John F. Kennedy was approaching all Americans to be the distinction, to stand firm, to roll out the improvement, and to do what is ethically right.

There was an incredible reference to our nation being the first to rebel against the desire of avaricious men, and that we are the beneficiaries of that insurgency with the obligation to maintain and convey essential human rights to every single person over the globe.

His extraordinary utilization of rationale and amazing feelings utilized all through the discourse brought this feeling of obligation, contended his suggestion to take action, and enabled his words to be very successful in the unification of the nationals of the United States and whatever remains of the world together.

inn [45]2 years ago
0 0

Answer:

John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address is a great historic speech with strong fundamental values that the United States still holds to this day. One of the values is the upcoming and new prosperous generation that Kennedy mentions , a strong new generation that does not forget its roots or what it stands for as it is portrayed in his Inaugural Address. Reasoning to support that mentioned value can be seen here from Kennedy's Inaugural Address itself , "We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of the first revolution. Let the world go forth from this time and place , to a friend and foe alike , that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--born in this century, tempered by war , disciplined by a hard and bitter peace , proud of our ancient heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been commited, and to which we are commited today at home and around the world."Another mentioned value is the American freedom and duty to always stand up for and protect liberty and freedom , reasoning presented here as the speech states , "Let every nation know, wheter it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and success of liberty". Another mentioned value is the support and the unification with other countries and nations. In his Inaugural Adress Kennedy states , "To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do--for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder. To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of  colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny".

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Where were the native homes standing over when Vespucci came? over the bridges on top of the mountains over bushes over water
kobusy [5.1K]
<span>
The native homes were standing over the water when Vespucci came. Amerigo Vespucci sailed along the northern coast of South America until he reached the Lake Macaraibo where he saw the stilted huts of native people that they built along the shore.<span>
</span></span>
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following factors contributed the most to Omani traders’ ability to undertake the voyages depicted on the maps?
Paul [167]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The factors that contributed the most to Omani traders’ ability to undertake the voyages depicted on the maps were the following.

The factors were navigational and maritime innovations such as the astrolabe and lateen sail.

Omani people were very good traders and sailors. They developed important trade routes in the zones of the Indan Ocean and the Persian Gulf until the territories of modern-day Pakistan and Iraq. Indeed the Empire had much success through trading, rivaling freat navigation fleets of European superpowers such as Spain and Portugal.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was western traffic in need of improvement?
Sonja [21]
<span>to handle the frontier movement </span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help ASAP!!!
slega [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

Stephen Austin was a settler and lawyer who played a large part in the separation of Texas from Mexico. He brought many people from Mexico into Texas to help the state grow. He influenced many people to come to the state from other states too.

6 0
2 years ago
How did the tariffs controversy expose sectional differences between the North and South?
vitfil [10]

The correct answer is number 2) the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.

The tariffs controversy exposed sectional differences between the North and the South in that the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.

The Congress of the United States passed the Tariff 0f 1828 on May 19, in order to protect the production of goods in the country, specifically in the states of the North. But Southern states immediately opposed to the act, heading by South Carolina, that considered the decision as to the "Tariff of Abominations," because the act set a 38% tax of most imported good. This represented a negative impact on the economy of the Southern states.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Park Geun-Hye’s presidency is particularly challenging because
    11·2 answers
  • Which 1896 Supreme Court case resulted in the “separate but equal” doctrine?
    14·2 answers
  • Members of Congress signed the "Southern Manifesto" to ______.
    6·2 answers
  • which best describes why government collects taxes? a. to control the value of currency b. to keep the government running c. to
    6·2 answers
  • Why did some people in China consider Mao Zedong a despot?
    10·2 answers
  • Under the war powers act, what branch of government was given sweeping new authority to carry on the war science forum
    13·1 answer
  • Given the historical context of Smith's time, what might have made his writing controversial? Give an example of how his theorie
    11·1 answer
  • To understand the values expressed in a myth, what are the best elements in the story for a reader to consider? Check all that a
    5·2 answers
  • Why might you expect conflict to develop between the English and the French in North America?
    13·1 answer
  • Write an essay describing the quote in relation to the opinion of Rizal to the Katipunan’s Plan "To die and conquer is pleasant;
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!