Answer:
Increase in operating income by $12,000
Explanation:
The above is an incomplete question because the value for 'space normally used to produce the rented line' is missing. However, I assumed the value is $26,000 per year as gotten from the internet -Chegg.
Given the above information, the operating income can be affected as calculated below;
Sales revenue $85,000
Add additional revenue $26,000
Total revenue $11,1000
Less: variable expenses ($40,000)
Contribution margin $71,000
Less: fixed expense ($52,000)
New net operating income
$19,000
Less: Original operating income
($7,000)
Increase in operating income
$12,000
Answer: Dina's labor the car wash dina receives the $300 per week and charles earns working for spotless car wash
Explanation: The flow from a firm to a household can be in the form of goods and services purchased by the household or in the form of flow of factor income to the household. Out of the given options, Dina's labor in the car wash and Charles earning from spotless car wash represent a flow of income from the firm to the households. While, Charles spending on airline tickets represent a flow from the household to the firm in the form of expenditure for buying a service. So, a and b are correct.
Option C
Direct labor hours ; Indirect labor is not an example of a cost and its related cost driver
<u>Explanation:</u>
A cost driver triggers a variation in the price of the activity. The idea is everywhere ordinarily employed to allocate aloft prices to the abundance of built assemblies. It can further be related to activity-based costing inquiry to ascertain the circumstances of expenses, which can be done to depreciate overhead prices.
In unusual accounting systems, cost drivers are practically inapplicable in determining the enrichment, Quantity of set-ups, Amount of machine-hours, Amount of labor hours, Abundance of orders bound and uttered.
Answer:
total payoff = $50000
Explanation:
solution
The payment is indicated on a specific node in a circular format.
This is the sum of the results and their possibilities.
we get here now total payoff node is
total payoff = 0.5 × $100,000 + 0.5 × 0
total payoff = $50000
and given the number, it shows that the right decision is the cancer lab. This is because it has the highest price with expected 60000
Answer:
The authority compliance style
Explanation:
The authority compliance style is one of the Blake / Mouton leadership grips where the manager believes that the employees are just a form of means to achieving a goal . As a result of this , the set goals are given more priority over the employees.
Employees under this managerial form of leadership are not motivated as they are forced to work towards achieving the managers goals with in a very stringent condition.
