Well, whoever made this question forgot to add in one of the answers, which is the correct one. IT WOULD BE D. Wicked
Focusing on Passepartout’s perspective makes the story
objective. Passepartout doesn’t have a personal bias or have anything to prove
so he doesn't react impulsively or affectionately. (Greenleafable,
Brainly)“Being much less cool-headed than Mr. Fogg, he was
much more restless, counting and recounting the days passed over, uttering
maledictions when the train stopped, and accusing it of sluggishness, and
mentally blaming Mr. Fogg for not having bribed the engineer. The worthy fellow
was ignorant that, while it was possible by such means to hasten the rate of a
steamer, it could not be done on the railway.” This is a quote showing that the
narrator is telling the story from third person, not Passepartou from first, thus giving the story a more real and relatable aspect to it.
Which statement best illustrates Anne’s perspective in the excerpt? She often expresses her hatred of the Nazis and her desire that they be punished for their crimes. The fact that her sister was ordered to go to a work camp by the Nazis and then the whole family went into hiding and that they suffered and were aware of the atrocities of the Nazis during their occupation of the Netherlands is reflected in her diaryl
Answer:
B. Show an example of the United States' indifference to the plight of the Jews
Explanation:
A part of the text <em>clearly shows</em> that Eliezer Wiesel is trying to show America's indifference to the plight of the Jews. He is not able to understand why and how it happened on the highest level in the greatest democracy and the most generous of all new nations
<em>"A thousand people – In America, the great country, the greatest democracy, the most generous of all new nations in modern history. What happened? I don’t understand. </em><em>Why the indifference…..</em><em>"</em>
There is not mention of sending more troops, death of President Franklin, or any evidence or mention of 1000 Jews killed on St. Louis.
Answer:
Enjambed line.
Explanation:
In poetry, an enjambment is a literary device in which there is a disproportion between the syntax and the metric of a verse.
It can easily be recognized as the idea is not fully expressed by the end of a verse. An enjambment breaks the thought in two and it must be continued through the following line.
This literary device was frowned upon by the classics but was kindly welcomed by the romantics due to its strong <em>expressiveness</em>.
