Answer:
How hotly the sun shone overhead!
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
The correct answer for above statement is :
D) highlight each category of detail with a different color,
Explanation:
Supporting details are matters and circumstances that demonstrate, explain, or unless help the reader surmise the topic sentence. Anything that reveals more about the topic is a promoting detail! Supporting details are applied to explain and support the central idea of a sentence, paragraph, essay, or even story. An idea with supporting features is just that, an idea.
Answer:
Sí
Explanation:
<em>Saque la basura </em>is a formal command in the imperativce mood in which the verb<em> saque </em>agrees with the ommited subject pronoun <em>usted.</em>
Answer:
I would for sure say that its C
Explanation:
