Writing from Grendel's point of view, makes him seem more monstrous and dangerous.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Writing from Grendel's perspective makes him seem more monstrous. Even though we get to see the story from his perspective, he has a very narrow range of emotions. He is unable to relate to the actual humans in the book, showing that he is fundamentally different from them. Beowulf and the other warriors are typical humans, and Grendel is a one-dimensional monster.
The lack of common ground between these two kinds of characters makes the division between them very obvious. Therefore, it's difficult to find sympathy for Grendel as you would for another human.
A word that fills in the blank well is sarcastic Sarcasm is a type of irony, called verbal irony, that makes statements about a character that are obviously not true, and are included to add humor to the novel.
It could be either the hous shook or shakes because of past and present tense
The film provides a better medium when it comes to interpreting the play. The audio version lacks key elements such as sound effects and emotional expression. On the other hand, the film uses lighting and facial expressions to convey certain themes and emotions.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A. He is a wanderer.
Explanation:
Referring to the book <em>"Heart of Darkness."</em>, we have a narrator named Charlie Marlow.
The main narrator describes him as someone similar to Buddha. He is someone who sees beyond what he really has in front. <u>He is not a simple seaman like the others</u>. He is an honest and intelligent person, detached from everything material.
The narrator even says it explicitly in the lines <em>“But Marlow was not typical, and to him the meaning of an episode was not inside like a kernel but outside ...”</em> and also <em>“He did not represent his class”.
</em>
The main narrator says that unlike the others seaman, Marlow did not lead a sedentary life, but was a wanderer. The way he told his story was very different from the simple way others did it.
