<span>the two ways patrons support the renaissance movement were:
They encouraged the spread of arts and education.
They provided financial support to artists.
Patrons were the people that give personal financial support for a cause. During the renaissance period, many wealthy merchant gave out their monet in order to built schools, museum, and various form of financial aid for the artists that they support.</span>
The answer in the provided question above is an unrealistic
self concept in which their ways or things that they believe aren’t real as
what mature or much older people seem which led children to have impossible
ideas and a means of belief that they can do or achieve anything.
Answer:
The options actually are:
No; our company’s concern with product quality has allowed competitors to capture market share by offering slightly inferior but less expensive products.
Argument strong / weak
Yes; many employees ignore company procedures designed to ensure that our product quality standards are met.
Argument strong / weak
The first argument is strong
The second argument is weak
Explanation:
The first argument is logical because keeping up with the competitors' low priced products is a genuine source of concern.The quality procedures could still be adhered strictly if the product is perceived as been of very high quality in the eyes of the customers, as the saying goes that the real beauty lies in the eyes of the beholders,meaning that this is something for customers to judge.
The second argument is weak,override of control procedures by some employees is not a tenable excuse not to have the right quality products manufactured,since carrot and stick approach of punishing non-compliant employees and rewarding compliant employees is at their disposal.
Answer:
New York Times V. United States 1971
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times.
The government used the reasoning of national security by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was that the government couldn't say that there was a danger to the United States if they couldn't prove it.
Explanation:
Answer: Schizotypal
Explanation: The personality disorder that fits the best in Kumar's case is the schizotypal personality disorder.
This type of disorder involves difficulties in making or mantaining relationships, eccentric behavior (strange manners for example) and cognitive and perceptual distortions.
