Answer:
In 1894 a car company cut its workers already low pay by about 25% causing the workers to strike and boycott the company. This effected railroads nationwide bringing american business to a halt. It also allowed the workers to voice their demands as a group. So for the most part, the boycott was successful, but the boycott did have some cons too. Many of the strike workers lost their jobs, and the new hired workers conditions didn't improve. Also, the unions leader was jailed, and the federal government had to get involved to stop the strike. The boycott was successful, but it came with many downsides.
Explanation:
I just had this question on edgenuity
Bandura attributes aggressive behaviors to : The impact of observing models
Since we're little, we tend to observe the other people around us to determine how we should react to an event.
If for example, a child leave in a family that always act aggressive everytime small things happens, he will eventually grow up thinking that it's a proper way to deal with every small things that happen<span />
Answer: Deliberative
Explanation: Arguments which are embarked upon by members of a group usually in other to explain the different sides of a particular topic. In other words, deliberative arguments usually involves members of a group which work collectively to show people the pros and cons of a certain topic or subject before finally arriving at a certain general conclusion or consensus. In deliberative arguments, the objective or goal of the topic is already known by the collaborating proposed, but in other to resolve underlying unambiguities, participants first come up with different and incompatible views before finally reaching a consensus.
The answer is effort justification. It is an idea as well as paradigm in the social psychology in which people who have reach the goal yet discover that it was not worth it. It is from the cognitive dissonance theory of Leon Festinger.
Tell him that even though his method works, you know of a better method. Show him your approach and recommend he always use it going forward.
Explanation:
The best thing to do in this problem is to tell him that even though his method works, there is a better method.
- This better method is best presented in a subtle and practical way.
- It is best to relate the new method to the experience employee and with his experience he should be able to make logical decisions on which method to adopt.
- it is not easy to disrupt the way things are being done. it puts the whole process at risk through with productivity can suffer.
- To disrupt a process in a good way, all parties should ratify the new process and come to terms with it.
- This can be done by a little demo to show how positively the new technique can improve productivity, efficiency and other important parameters.
Learn more:
Ethics brainly.com/question/5907615
#learnwithBrainly
