Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here 
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that
So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:
One of the factors is (7x + 5).
One of the factors is (6y – 7).
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Start by writing 492,623 in standard form
4 hundred thousands + 9 ten thousands + 2 thousands + 6 hundreds + 2 tens + 3 ones
We can write this in other ways by moving a digit to the next smaller place value. For example, we move the 4 one place to the right to get 49 ten thousands:
49 ten thousands + 2 thousands + 6 hundreds + 2 tens + 3 ones
Then, we can move the 49 ten thousands to the right to get 492 thousands, and we can move 6 hundreds to the right to get 62 tens.
492 thousands + 62 tens + 3 ones
Or, we can do this:
4926 hundreds + 23 ones
(m + n + 3)(m + n + 4)
First distribute the m in the first set of parentheses to the second set of parentheses. Do the same process with the n and the 3.
m^2 + mn + 4m + mn + n^2 + 4n + 3m +3n + 12
Combine Like terms. Final Answer:
m^2 + n^2 + 2mn + 7m + 7n + 12
surface area = 4 x pi x r^2
diameter = 1 so radius = 1/2 = 0.5
4 x 3.14 x 0.5^2 = 3.14 meters^2
